He further observed that the mere fact that a judge participated in the proceedings as one of the parties could not be a reason to institute disciplinary proceedings against her.

Bálintová, and to declare the remainder of the application inadmissible; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.

The mere fact that the applicant association’s claims had been dismissed was not in itself sufficient for a conclusion as to whether or not the remedy in question was effective.

Parents should not be forced, as they had been in the case before the Court, merely to stand by while their children were entrusted into the care of a community whose leaders included people with serious

However, it had not been the case.

The situation of the child and the foster parents had not materially changed since the case was before the courts. The care in the foster home was regarded as secure, stable and foreseeable.

    The case concerns a care order issued in respect of the applicant’s children, X and Y, and the determination of the applicant’s contact rights in respect of them. 2.

        The Board finally pointed to the recent legislation in Peru which emphasised the interest of the child, provided for care in cases of neglect and ill-treatment and

In the case of Kiyutin v.

        On 23 May 1989 the Disciplinary Board of Health Care decided, on the basis of the case-file from the District Court and observations submitted by the National Board

margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law

When identity cards provided for an indication of religion, the mere fact of leaving the relevant entry blank would inevitably have a specific connotation.

margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law

Moreover, the Government had not adduced any evidence that manifestly cast doubt on the authenticity of the documents produced. Accordingly, there was no reason to doubt the applicant’s credibility.

margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law

The expert panel further indicated that it had formed a strong opinion that the situation of these highly successful candidates could not statistically be explained by mere coincidence.

XE..., Pierre Z..., demeurant tous deux PK 49,900, côté montagne, Faaone (Polynésie française), défendeurs à la cassation ; Les demandeurs invoquent, à l'appui de leur pourvoi, les deux moyens de cassation

margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right }   Communicated on 19 September 2017   FIRST SECTION Application no. 29417/17 LENKA MALAGIĆ against Croatia lodged on 6 April 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

FB COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Audience publique du 22 novembre 2023 Cassation M.