CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1005DEC003468605
5 octobre 2010
Article 6 § 1 reads, in so far as relevant: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by [a] ... tribunal ...”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1005DEC001209805
The Court is of the view that this complaint falls to be examined under Article 8 of the Convention, which reads: “1.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12857
18 juin 2020
By principal judgment of 19 December 2018 (see Information Note 224 ), the Grand Chamber found a violation of Article   14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article   1 of Protocol No
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1218DEC005235114
18 décembre 2018
The material in question was admitted into evidence and read out at the hearing. 6 .
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-153595
11 mars 2015
The relevant parts of the judicial order read as follows: “...
ECLI:CEDH:001-147576
29 septembre 2014
In particular readers of Rzeczpospolita should have been aware of these facts as the newspaper published numerous articles on the issue.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1216DEC003947918
16 décembre 2020
  1, read alone and in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention. THE LAW 13.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0511DEC000844205
11 mai 2010
Article 6 § 1, in so far as relevant, reads: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by [a] ... tribunal ...”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1219DEC001181402
19 décembre 2002
  7/1996) read as follows: Section 1 “Section 180 of the Civil Obligations Act (the Official Gazette nos. 53/91, 73/91 and 3/94) shall be repealed.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0927DEC000979105
27 septembre 2016
The relevant part of this Article reads: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair   ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal....” 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0116DEC003238196
16 janvier 2001
  Section 51e of the Code of Administrative Offences ( Verwaltungsstrafgesetz ), as far as relevant, reads as follows: “2.
ECLI:CEDH:001-139132
15 novembre 2013
    Relevant domestic law Article 220(6) of the Criminal Code read, at the time of the events, as follows: “...Anyone who commits a crime on behalf of the (illegal) organisation, even if they
ECLI:CEDH:001-122346
12 juin 2013
    The Tax Code read at the time of events as follows: “ Article 5.
ECLI:CEDH:001-127693
2 octobre 2013
The court found that the average reader would understand the article as stating that the applicant was incapable of being an expert in custody proceedings because of her own mental health impairments in
ECLI:CEDH:001-146899
8 septembre 2014
The relevant part of the Ministry’s decision reads as follows: “In this type of administrative offence what is important for the purposes of ordering a protective measure is whether the statements of the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1211DEC000244803
11 décembre 2003
He relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the relevant part of which read as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing within
ECLI:CEDH:001-163379
2 mai 2016
After the presiding judge asked the witness for his personal information, the trial judge read out I.G.’s statement given before the investigating judge.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1023DEC007554501
23 octobre 2003
ECLI:CEDH:001-110556
21 février 2012
COMPLAINTS The applicant complains under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 – read alone and in conjunction with Article 13 – that the imposition of the 98% tax constituted unjustified deprivation of property
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0527DEC003170096
27 mai 1997
, or      statements to be read."
Page 52 sur 1410