CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

28 196 résultats pour « Rezad »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1005DEC003468605

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2010

5 octobre 2010

Article 6 § 1 reads, in so far as relevant: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by [a] ... tribunal ...”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1005DEC001209805

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2010

5 octobre 2010

The Court is of the view that this complaint falls to be examined under Article 8 of the Convention, which reads: “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12857

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2020

18 juin 2020

By principal judgment of 19 December 2018 (see Information Note 224 ), the Grand Chamber found a violation of Article   14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article   1 of Protocol No

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1218DEC005235114

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2018

18 décembre 2018

The material in question was admitted into evidence and read out at the hearing. 6 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-153595

Admin. suprême

11 mars 2015

11 mars 2015

The relevant parts of the judicial order read as follows: “...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-147576

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2014

29 septembre 2014

In particular readers of Rzeczpospolita should have been aware of these facts as the newspaper published numerous articles on the issue.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1216DEC003947918

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2020

16 décembre 2020

  1, read alone and in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention. THE LAW 13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0511DEC000844205

Admin. suprême

11 mai 2010

11 mai 2010

Article 6 § 1, in so far as relevant, reads: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by [a] ... tribunal ...”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1219DEC001181402

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2002

19 décembre 2002

  7/1996) read as follows: Section 1 “Section 180 of the Civil Obligations Act (the Official Gazette nos. 53/91, 73/91 and 3/94) shall be repealed.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0927DEC000979105

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2016

27 septembre 2016

The relevant part of this Article reads: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair   ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal....” 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0116DEC003238196

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2001

16 janvier 2001

  Section 51e of the Code of Administrative Offences ( Verwaltungsstrafgesetz ), as far as relevant, reads as follows: “2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-139132

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2013

15 novembre 2013

    Relevant domestic law Article 220(6) of the Criminal Code read, at the time of the events, as follows: “...Anyone who commits a crime on behalf of the (illegal) organisation, even if they

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-122346

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2013

12 juin 2013

    The Tax Code read at the time of events as follows: “ Article 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-127693

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2013

2 octobre 2013

The court found that the average reader would understand the article as stating that the applicant was incapable of being an expert in custody proceedings because of her own mental health impairments in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-146899

Admin. suprême

8 septembre 2014

8 septembre 2014

The relevant part of the Ministry’s decision reads as follows: “In this type of administrative offence what is important for the purposes of ordering a protective measure is whether the statements of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1211DEC000244803

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2003

11 décembre 2003

He relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the relevant part of which read as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing within

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-163379

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2016

2 mai 2016

After the presiding judge asked the witness for his personal information, the trial judge read out I.G.’s statement given before the investigating judge.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1023DEC007554501

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2003

23 octobre 2003

  7/1996) read as follows: Section 1 “Section 180 of the Civil Obligations Act (the Official Gazette nos. 53/91, 73/91 and 3/94) shall be repealed.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110556

Admin. suprême

21 février 2012

21 février 2012

COMPLAINTS The applicant complains under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 – read alone and in conjunction with Article 13 – that the imposition of the 98% tax constituted unjustified deprivation of property

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0527DEC003170096

Admin. suprême

27 mai 1997

27 mai 1997

, or      statements to be read."

Source officielle

Page 52 sur 1410

← PrécédentSuivant →