CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0904DEC002309093
4 septembre 1996
  Following the hearing, the Court of Appeal confirmed the fine on the same day.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0521JUD006931912
21 mai 2015
    In the same period about 150 claims similar to that of the applicant were lodged before the same court. 11 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0619JUD002274202
19 juin 2008
  Sections 10 § 1 and 405 § of the Civil Proceedings Act of 2005 provide the same. THE LAW I.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1203DEC002750695
3 décembre 1997
       The Government further submit that the entire period to be considered lasted from the date on which the investigations were instituted to the date of the judgment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002243993
15 mai 1996
  On the same day he was arrested.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-153734
18 mars 2015
The applicant’s ill-treatment lasted approximately until 8 p.m. 15.     At about 9 p.m. the applicant was taken to police station no.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1685722-1777724
8 juin 2006
    Repetitive cases   In the following cases the Court has reached the same findings as in similar cases raising the same issues under the Convention:     Collarile v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0507JUD002466003
7 mai 2009
In this connection, the Court notes that at that point the proceedings had lasted almost one year and nine months at one level of jurisdiction. 28.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121DEC003373616
21 janvier 2021
    On 3 November 2012 the applicant was arrested on charges of murder committed earlier that same day in Luhansk. 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1106JUD002902903
6 novembre 2008
The remittal orders were unnecessary, since the final first-instance court’s decision of 2001 had been the same as the decision given in 1987. 2. The Court’s consideration 27.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0218JUD001658304
18 février 2010
It was also decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility (Article 29 § 3). THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0929DEC000598903
29 septembre 2005
  723), refusing a request to re-open pre ‑ trial proceedings, which at that time had lasted for three years.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410JUD004116807
10 avril 2018
    During the hearings on the same day - which lasted from 11.30 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. for the first applicant, from 9.40 a.m. to 10.25 a.m. for the second applicant and from 10.30 a.m. to 11.25
ECLI:CEDH:001-159648
30 novembre 2015
On the same date police officer A.H. was arrested.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0524DEC002291808
24 mai 2011
same supplier, and to clarify whether fireworks for re ‑ exportation in reality found their way back to Denmark.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0226JUD007166011
26 février 2015
The trial court rejected this request the same day without giving any reasons. 28.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127JUD005955208
27 janvier 2015
For the offence to be regarded as having continued over a long period of time it had to have lasted for some months.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1107JUD002060205
7 novembre 2013
    On the same date the above criminal cases were joined. 24.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1015JUD004008114
15 octobre 2015
On 17   September 2014 the Kaluga FMS, for the same reasons, refused him temporary asylum. 36 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1023JUD001050802
23 octobre 2007
The second set began on an unspecified date before at least 13 December 1999 and terminated on 17 January 2001; thus, it lasted at least one year over three instances.
Page 52 sur 348
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.