The sole purpose, they said, was to develop and test techniques which could be used not in this country, but in the Occupied Territories. Both condemned the bombings, regarding them as short-sighted.

The servicemen showed them a body and told them that this man had been hiding in their household since the previous day, in the attic of Adnan I.’s house.

They claimed that the furniture had been destroyed by the police officers who had broken down the door and arrested them. 26.

The children were then driven away.   They were not allowed to take anything with them except the clothes they were wearing.

They contended under Article 5 of the Convention that they had been deprived of their liberty and security due to the conduct of the security forces.

The parents appealed first to the County Administrative Court, which rejected their appeals without holding an oral hearing, and then the Supreme Administrative Court, which rejected the appeal.

They submitted that these nuisances adversely affected their privates lives and the normal use of their homes.

    If the owner of the documents does not want to permit their search, they shall be sealed and deposited with the court; the Review Chamber must determine immediately whether they are to be

The prosecutor also stated that even though some violations were made during the investigation, this did not mean that they had influenced the outcome of the pre-trial investigation.

They requested their assistance in the preparation of a “Life Story Book” for S. and stated that they wished to establish indirect contact between them and S. via their letterbox scheme.

The policemen replied that they had not checked their papers because the occupants of the vehicle had been in a hurry.

‘which they needed for their work in the coming days’.

The letter received by the applicants in 1998 requesting them to vacate the property, which had amounted to a termination of their lease, had not been an acceptable means of terminating a right which they

The Commission noted that he might have nonetheless “encouraged” them to do what they could to protect their school.

    On 9 October 2012 the applicants submitted to the court their request to examine the case, repeating their description of the phrases which they found defamatory.

This Article shall not prevent the imposition of lawful restrictions on the exercise of these rights by members of the armed forces, of the police or of the administration of the State.” 43.

The abductors had taken them to an unknown destination and placed them in a pit. They had been kept there for about one week, and had been regularly beaten up by the perpetrators.

After a while, they called D.C. and P.T., who had stayed behind, and told them that Bogdan had forgotten a yellow plastic bag under their table at the bar and asked them if they could bring it to restaurant

the then applicable provisions in the 1940 Decree.