CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1120JUD003614103
20 novembre 2008
No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial
Page 52 sur 1635
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD003733802
22 septembre 2009
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2034
24 juin 2008
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0513JUD000998703
13 mai 2008
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0528JUD007283901
28 mai 2009
The Government asserted that the proceedings in the applicants’ case complied with the fair trial requirements under Article 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0326JUD002027105
26 mars 2009
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0728JUD000895804
28 juillet 2009
ECLI:CEDH:002-11174
26 novembre 2015
Note on the Court’s case-law 196 May 2016 Regner v. the Czech Republic (referral) - 35289/11 Judgment 26.11.2015 [Section V] Article 6 Administrative proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Adversarial trial
ECLI:CEDH:002-11168
23 mai 2016
No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Enforcement proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial;Equality of arms)
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0523JUD001750207
Article 47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial “Everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1126JUD003528911
Accordingly, the guarantees of the right to a fair trial applied even to this quite specific area. 31. In judgment no. II.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13541
1 février 2022
No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial;Equality of arms)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0201JUD000441818
legal systems of the various functions of the prosecutor’s offices aimed at the protection of the general or public interest as well as the rights of vulnerable persons, and the need to ensure fair-trial
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0613JUD001386319
13 juin 2023
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1122JUD000183710
22 novembre 2018
Such an opportunity would have been important also for the reason that during the pre-trial investigation only two experts had been interviewed and none of them had been questioned during the trial. 35
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1021JUD002259604
21 octobre 2010
On 14 November 2003 the trial court sent the parties a letter notifying them of the appeal hearing scheduled for 9 December 2003. 31.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1127JUD002524805
27 novembre 2012
The right to an adversarial trial had been violated by the mere fact that those observations had not been communicated to him. 24.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0401JUD004805712
1 avril 2021
-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1205JUD002524805
5 décembre 2013
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Adversarial trial);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings
civ2
613720c7cd580146773ee53c
5 octobre 1988
Bastide (Gironde), 6°/ Monsieur Jean Z..., demeurant ... d'Ornon (Gironde), 7°/ l'UNION INDUSTRIELLE AFRICAINE (UIA), dont le siège social est ..., 8°/ La SOCIETE AFRICAINE DES TRANSPORTS TROPICAUX