En conséquence, la Cour considère qu'alors que la liberté d'expression d'un journaliste comprend le recours possible à une dose d'exagération, voire même de provocation ( Dalban c.

France , précité, et Dalban c.   Roumanie [GC], n o 28114/95, § 44, CEDH 1999 ‑ VI). 37.

France , 25 juin 1996, § 36, Recueil 1996 ‑ III, et Dalban c. Roumanie [GC], n o 28114/95, § 44, CEDH 1999 ‑ VI).

  Saffet Güneş le «   requérant   » bien qu'il faille aujourd'hui attribuer cette qualité à ses héritières ( Dalban c. Roumanie [GC], n o 28114/95, § 1, CEDH 1999-VI, et Çakar c.

France , 25 juin 1996, §   36 , Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996 ‑ III   ; Dalban c. Roumanie [GC], n o   28114/95, §   44, CEDH 1999 ‑ VI   ; Jensen c.

Marinică Stanomirescu comme «   le requérant   » bien qu’il faille aujourd’hui attribuer cette qualité à ses héritiers (voir, par exemple, Dalban c.

des raisons d’ordre pratique, le présent arrêt continuera d’appeler Elif Kızıl «   requérante   » bien qu’il faille aujourd’hui attribuer cette qualité à ses héritiers (voir, par exemple, Dalban

France , 25   June 1996, § 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 ‑ III, and Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI).

deprive him or her of his or her status as a “victim” unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see Dalban

France , 25 June 1996, § 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III; Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI; and Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no.

x2011; III) and has emphasised that it has to be taken into account whether the expressions at issue concern a person’s private life or their behaviour and attitudes in the capacity of an official (see Dalban

sufficient to deprive him of his status as a "victim" unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see, Dalban

also covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation and cannot be regarded as overstepping the limits set by the Convention and the case-law on freedom of the press (see Dalban

sufficient to deprive him of his status as a “victim” unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see Dalban

deprived of the status of “victim” where the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, the breach of the Convention and then afforded appropriate redress for it (see Dalban

demandeurs d’asile et, notamment, de Guinéens, l’ACAT explique qu’il existe de nombreux partis politiques guinéens, dont l’Union des forces démocratiques de Guinée (UFDG) dirigée par Cellou   Dallein

The Court does not therefore consider that this can be construed as the “degree of exaggeration” or “provocation” which are permissible in exercising journalistic freedom (see Dalban v.

34 of the Convention unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded appropriate redress for the breach of the Convention (see, among others, Dalban

sufficient to deprive him of his status as a “victim” unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded redress for, the breach of the Convention (see, Dalban