Z. had refused to live with the applicant in Katowice in view of his categorical refusal to allow him to have contacts with his mother in his apartment.

As T. later stated, the applicant explained that he had accidentally hit G. with his car.

  On 28 April 1989 the Dortmund District Court convicted him of theft and, taking into account his previous conviction, sentenced him, as juvenile, to seven months' imprisonment on probation.

When questioned in police custody, the applicant did not make any comments to the police with regard to the charges against him. He simply answered questions about his identity.

course of the investigation proceedings he is not already informed in his own language about the charge levelled against him enabling him to prepare his defence adequately.

He further alleges that police officers placed a plastic bottle filled with water on the back of his head and his neck and hit him through the bottle with fists and a rubber truncheon.

He was then hit on his knee causing him to fall to the ground. His arms were bound and he was thrown into a car.

Allegedly, three officers forced him to make a confession in relation to other robberies, beat him on different parts of his body and squeezed his right hand thumb between the door and the frame.

On 8 November 2007 he had been taken from his home by police officers, who had told him that the applicant had accused him of stealing some cables from the building site.

He particularly argues that the charges against him were fabricated, his conviction was based on planted evidence, his right to confidential communication with his lawyer was breached, and that the criminal

Ch. and K. of the criminal investigation department, who punched and kicked him in his abdomen and head in order to force him to confess.

in order for him to be able to prove his innocence.

The telegram itself had not been forwarded to him until 2 May 2011 because his probation officer had been absent for the bank holiday weekend. 10.

  While they were taking a grip on the applicant and pushed him to the ground, the applicant hit his head on the bumper of a nearby car.

him and his family. 17.

In particular, the applicant complained that he had been dismissed and that it had been noted in his labour record that his dismissal had been caused by him committing a theft.

in order to serve his prison sentence and the Romanian prison authorities did not allow him to complete his high-school education in prison.

On 10 March 2006 the applicant was informed by the Council of Ministers that it had decided to issue an order depriving him of his Cypriot citizenship.

According to him, as a result of this treatment he partially lost the use of his arms for some time and was hospitalised.