The Government submitted that the applicant company had lost its victim status as a result of the courts’ rulings in the proceedings initiated by it under Law No. 87. 7.

instance de NOUMEA (RG n° :20/02) Saisine de la cour : 11 Juin 2020 APPELANT LA COMMUNE DE [Localité 4] représentée par son Maire en exercice, Siège : [Adresse 3] Représenté par Me Séverine LOSTE

The Government also contended that the applicant had lost his “victim status” after the domestic courts had expressly acknowledged a violation of the applicant’s right to the enforcement of a final judgment

  This decision concerns in particular Article 2, paragraph 4 of this Law, according to which claimants in the applicant's position who had been awarded partial compensation, lost their entitlement

  Also in the proceedings before the European Court the applicants claimed compensation in the amount of 8.000.000 EUR, in particular for lost profits which they could have derived from the company

The Government argued that for some periods of their detentions (see the appended table) all the applicants had lost their victim status because they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law no. 169

  112/1995, against the State for the recovery of the possession of an immovable property lost during the communist regime.

The Court, having regard to the unequivocal statement made by the applicant and notwithstanding the Government's declaration, observes that the applicant has lost interest in pursuing his application regarding

several occasions,   sometimes using truncheons, and subjected him to abuse, harassment and various forms of physical and psychological ill-treatment, with the result that he had, among other things, lost

    In the light of the above, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 of the Convention, the Court now considers that the applicant has lost interest in his application.

    In the light of the above, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 of the Convention, the Court now considers that the applicant has lost interest in his application.

    In the light of the above, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention, the Court now considers that the applicant has lost interest in her application.

    In the light of the above, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention, the Court now considers that the applicant has lost interest in her application.

practices in question when the “victim” no longer consented had not been honoured; they had drunk significant quantities of alcohol, so that all sense of organisation or control of the situation had been lost

The applicant sustained an open traumatic brain injury and lost consciousness. That night the applicant was taken to hospital for treatment and the police were informed of the incident.

The first reason concerned the suspension of the applicant’s pension entitlement from 1 January 1963, when she lost her French nationality following Algerian independence.

They had survived the Holocaust as children and one of them had lost her family through the Holocaust.

He had brought himself into a situation in which he lost his canonical mandate to perform that function.

In these circumstances, having regard to Article   37   §   1   (a) of the Convention, the Court concludes that the applicants have lost interest in their applications and no longer