The applicant relied on Article 6 of the Convention, complaining that the presiding judge had declared admissible the records of his questioning of 19 March 2002, which had been carried out

This case was assigned to the newly composed Second Section (Rule 52 § 1). THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 8.

In the case of Antonov v.

In the case of Zalevskiy v.

On 31 January 1991, the case-file was transmitted to the said court. In an order of 16 February 1996, the Court of Appeal fixed the date of the hearing at 14 March 1996.   11.

HCC [Housing Construction Cooperative] on 21 March 2016, I hereby decide: 1. the demolition of the two-storey building situated ... in the Sabail district ... shall be carried out by F.B.

In the case of Yemkuzheva v.

In the case of Mtchedlishvili v.

The circumstances of the case 3.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 4.

cassation ; Le demandeur invoque, à l'appui de son pourvoi, le moyen unique de cassation annexé au présent arrêt ; Vu la communication faite au procureur général ; LA COUR, en l'audience publique du 20 mars

In the case of Bykov v.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

  In the case of Orosz and Others v.

TURKEY   In a judgment delivered at Strasbourg on 28 March 2000 in the case of Mahmut Kaya v.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as presented by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

    The case originated in an application (no.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.

  He was fined AS 1,800,000 or three months' imprisonment in case of non-payment of the fine.           The judgment relates to 318 different cases.

  In the present case, the Court notes that the water-management works carried out were part of a general land improvement programme in the re-parcelled area.