of the European Court of Human Rights in the Edelmayer case delivered on 19 December 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Freunberger case delivered on 19 December 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Pawlinkowska case delivered on 8 July 2003 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; &#xa0

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Ostrowski case delivered on 28 September 2004 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Gündüz and others delivered on 14 November 2000 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Yolcu case delivered on 5 February 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

droits de l’homme Radio Twist, A.S. contre la République slovaque   (Requête n o 62202/00, arrêt du 19 décembre 2006, définitif le 19 mars 2007)     Le Comité des Ministres, en vertu de l’article

Court of Human Rights in the Ferreira Pinto case delivered on 26 June 2003 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the case

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Morais Sarmento case delivered on 3 October 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Ülger case delivered on 28 March 2002 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling

of the European Court of Human Rights in the S. case delivered on 19 December 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Manasson case delivered on 20 July 2004 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;  

collection, pouvait à tout moment revenir à son affectation initiale d'habitation qui résultait du règlement de copropriété, la cour d'appel a pu en déduire que sa superficie devait, en application de l'article

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Velho da Costa de Abreu Rocha and Tito de Morais case delivered on 23 March 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers on the same date under Article

final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Loyen No. 2 delivered on 30 September 2003 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Kemal Güven case delivered on 22 May 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the

of the European Court of Human Rights in the Aygördü and others case delivered on 22 May 2001 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention; Recalling that

Court of Human Rights in the case of Netolický and Netolická delivered on 11 January 2005 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling

Court of Human Rights in the Balasoiu case delivered on 20 April 2004 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers under Article 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the case originated

nom du père   ;   Rappelant l’obligation de l’État défendeur, en vertu de l’article 46, paragraphe   1, de la Convention, de se conformer aux arrêts définitifs dans les litiges auxquels