anonyme de droit luxembourgeois, dont le siège est [Adresse 2] (Luxembourg), 5°/ à la société Oaktree France, société par actions simplifiée, dont le siège est [Adresse 5], 6°/ à la société Du Beau

The court heard the case in the applicant’s absence because she had failed to attend the hearing. The judgment was served on the applicant on 28   November 2000. COMPLAINTS 1.

According to that decision, it was not necessary that the applicant be heard because the findings of the medical commission were sufficient to justify her compulsory admission in the psychiatric ward.

As neither spouse appealed against that judgment, it became final. At a later date the applicant filed a petition for divorce with a court in his home state of Florida (USA).

On 25 September 2005 the applicant lodged a request to delete the conviction of Article 209 from the criminal record because Article 209 had been repealed in the meantime.

The hearing scheduled for 8 September 1999 was adjourned because of an illness of a court expert.

On 4 January 1999 the court adjourned a hearing because of the applicant’s illness.

BIO AUTO c/ Me SCP MONEGER- ASSIER - BELAUD - Mandataire de S.C.I. GECIFLO, S.C.I.

X... alias Y..., qui avait participé, le 18 septembre 1979, en tant que soliste, à une séance d'enregistrement de l'oeuvre musicale " Just because of you ", chanson destinée à intégrer la bande sonore

The court concluded that the applicants presented such risks because they were charged with an exceptionally serious crime and because the investigation was in its initial phase.

    In March 2023 the Supreme Court granted the applicant leave to appeal and, in a judgment of 29 November 2023, held that her human rights had been violated because Finnish legislation did

The applicant’s statement was the following: “I do not want to leave prison because other things are happening.

Il convient de dire l'appel de la SCI Belaid irrecevable.

Preliminary objections rejected (ratione materia, victim);Violation of Art. 6-1 due to lack of fair hearing;Violation of Art. 6-1 because of right of access to court;No violation of Art. 6-1 as regards

On 26   April 2002 the court returned the applicant’s complaint because it did not comply with the procedural requirements prescribed by law.

this would not have allowed for any flexibility if the child was unavailable at a particular time, on account of her state of health or because of other reasons. 7 .

    Of the four hearings listed between 5 April 2000 and 28 February 2001, three hearings were adjourned because the defendants did not attend and one hearing was adjourned because the judge

The applicants participated in both civil and the ensuing enforcement proceedings as interested third parties on the side of the municipality because the road in question enabled them to access their properties

He submitted, among other things, that he had previously been imprisoned in Syria because of his oppositional activities; that he was still of interest to the Syrian authorities; and that he had been called