The MSLU appealed, but on 20 February 2002 the Moscow City Court upheld the decision in favour of the applicant. 8.

    At the time of the latest communication with the applicant, the judgment of 9 June 1999 in the applicant's favour remained unenforced. RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 14.

On 18 November 1998 the Lazarevskiy District Court took the decision in the applicant's favour.

    The Court observes that the applicant does not complain about any unlawful act of a bailiff but rather about the fact that the judgment in his favour was not enforced.

    He sued the Welfare Office of Novovoronezh and the local department of the Federal Treasury for unpaid social benefits and obtained five judgments in his favour. A.

    The judgment in the applicant’s favour remains unenforced. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 15.

    The applicant reiterated that the State was responsible for the delay in the enforcement of the court judgment in his favour. 23.

    On 28 September 2001 the Voronezh Department of the Central Bank of Russia informed the applicant that the judgment in her favour could not be enforced for lack of the debtor’s funds. 8.

    The applicant complained about the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment in her favour.

    The applicant complained about the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment in her favour.

    The Government submitted from the outset that the domestic judgments in the applicants’ favour had been executed in full prior to being quashed and they were not required to reimburse them

    All the applicants were party to civil proceedings in which the first ‑ instance and appeal courts found in their favour.

She avers, in particular, that she could not bring a court action against the liquidation commission as it no longer existed at the time the second judgment in her favour was delivered.

    The applicant complained of the quashing on supervisory review of a binding and enforceable judgment delivered in his favour in 2002. 4.

    On 11 April 2006 the Court decided to communicate the complaints concerning the non-enforcement of judgments given in the applicants' favour to the Government.

Judgments of 27 December 2000 and 21 December 2001 in the applicant’s favour 5.     The applicant is in receipt of compensation for health damage.

    Were the final judicial decisions in the above cases in favour of the applicants enforced and, if yes, when? 2.

  3713) proscribing disseminating propaganda in favour of a terrorist organisation. The court then sent the file to Adana Assize Court. 8.

    He sued the Welfare Office of Novovoronezh and the local department of the Federal Treasury for unpaid social benefits and obtained seven judgments in his favour. A.