CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

65 529 résultats pour « Hiss »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102DEC004471906

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2010

2 novembre 2010

In May 1999 his boss told him people could only leave the service if they retired or died. After this, his life became unbearable. His colleagues no longer trusted him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1007DEC003258196

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2003

7 octobre 2003

A medical report was issued stating that the applicant had ecchymoses measuring 2 and 3 cm on both sides of his hip and allergic dermatosis on his right hand.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1006JUD003736405

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2016

6 octobre 2016

The applicant had thought that the young man was going to attack him, and had therefore picked up his knife from the ground and stabbed him. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-172234

Admin. suprême

23 février 2017

23 février 2017

His son resides with him and his spouse. 8.     The applicant’s passport indicates that he has a son, E.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-115443

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2012

21 novembre 2012

F., his driver, and the chief security agent of the company, who were standing near the car, sustained bodily injuries.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179143

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2017

6 novembre 2017

The applicant complains, relying on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, about the decision of the domestic courts refusing to compensate him the costs of his defence lawyer, even though in the criminal proceedings

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-128019

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2013

9 octobre 2013

He requested the Brovary Court, at which his case file was kept, to provide him with copies of various documents from the file, including his cassation appeal and the decision of the Supreme Court in his

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1202DEC005678311

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2014

2 décembre 2014

unfair and in breach of his rights of defence, and that it had been impossible for him to have the charges re ‑ examined in his presence. 40.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0117DEC002271593

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 1995

17 janvier 1995

threatened to arrest him and had rejected his requests relating to the taking of evidence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-118371

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2013

12 mars 2013

against him and no grounds to arrest him and remand him in custody.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-187329

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2018

2 octobre 2018

The applicant argued inter alia that the failure of the court of appeal to call T.Q. as a defence witness had deprived him of an opportunity to effectively exercise his defence rights, which in itself

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-109441

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2011

14 décembre 2011

    The applicant complains under Article 5 § 4 that on 21 August 2006 and 8 May 2007 his detention was extended in his and his lawyer’s absence, and that on 28 April 2007 his detention was extended

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0205JUD002964410

Admin. suprême

5 février 2015

5 février 2015

He also signed reports confirming that his rights had been explained to him and waived his right to a lawyer. 31.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68160-68628

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2000

19 septembre 2000

two minors under 15, was served on him on 19 October 1995.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0205JUD006728610

Admin. suprême

5 février 2013

5 février 2013

He settled in St Petersburg, where his wife and minor daughter joined him in 2006.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0702DEC002750795

Admin. suprême

2 juillet 1997

2 juillet 1997

the treatment in prison and his various letters away from him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-730

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2010

30 novembre 2010

On 7   January 2002 a district court convicted him and ordered him to undergo in-patient psychiatric treatment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-112406

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2008

27 juin 2008

He found out that four out of eight persons who had testified against him were not actually registered as voters in his constituency.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0706DEC003055096

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 1999

6 juillet 1999

Moreover section 45 contains no prohibition against the police interviewing a terrorist suspect before his solicitor arrives to consult with him. ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-140681

Admin. suprême

7 janvier 2014

7 janvier 2014

his aggressors.

Source officielle

Page 54 sur 3277

← PrécédentSuivant →