du rétablissement personnel sans liquidation judiciaire Rendue par le Tribunal judiciaire de DIJON, le 21 Mai 2026 ENTRE : DEMANDEUR(S) : Monsieur [Z] [J] 27 allée de la Cude 21370 VELARS SUR OUCHE

été assujettie au titre de l'année 2012 à raison d'immeubles à usage de logements sociaux, dont elle est propriétaire avenue des Acacias et avenue des Tilleuls à Sainte-Pazanne (44680) et avenue de l'Ouche

2001 APPELANT: Monsieur Alain X... né le 30 Juin 1957 à NOUVION (80860) 95 rue de Chezy 92200 NEUILLY SUR SEINE représenté par la SCP CHATTELEYN ET GEORGE, avoués à la Cour assisté de Me JOUBERT DES OUCHES

In the City Court’s view the classical lexical definition of racism, which related to the belief that one race was superior to another according to physical and mental distinctions, ought to be supplemented

Since it appears that the applicant was responsive ( aanspreekbaar ) by 9.45 a.m., he ought not to have been taken into police custody only at 12 noon.

The applicant lodged an appeal on points of law in which he complained that the investigating judge’s testimony ought to have been excluded.

finding as follows: “The court did not accept the defence’s argument that, when it comes to the question of the applicable law, the law which was in force at the time of the commission of the crime ought

becomes aware of circumstances which render such a remedy ineffective; in such a case it is appropriate to take the start of the six-month period as the date on which he or she first became aware or ought

On 8 August 2009 the applicants appointed an architect who estimated that the rented property ought to at least attract a rental income of EUR   36,700 yearly.

3 in cases of this kind lies in the act of exposing an individual to the risk of ill-treatment, the existence of the risk must be assessed primarily with reference to those facts which were known or ought

        However, the magistrates considered that the applicant in fact had disposable income and ought to have made an offer of payment.

Court observes that the applicant did not contend that the authorities of the respondent State were responsible for the death of Mr   Makar; nor did the applicant imply that the authorities knew or ought

Furthermore, it ought also to protect the authorities and other persons concerned from being under any uncertainty for a prolonged period of time (see Bulut and Yavuz v.

Furthermore, it ought also to protect the authorities and others concerned from being in a position of uncertainty for a prolonged period of time (see Bulut and Yavuz v.

    Article 9 of the Bill of Rights 1689 states (in modern English): “That the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in Parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court

Furthermore, it ought also to protect the authorities and other persons concerned from being under any uncertainty for a prolonged period of time (see Bayram and Yıldırım v.

question the findings of the domestic courts that the applicant had not provided sufficient proof that her statement was not defamatory and, in fact, that she had published facts which she had known or ought

Concerning the first set of proceedings, he alleges that he ought to have been recruited at the same grade as those who had passed the competition and were recruited six years before him.

  He also alleges further breaches of Article 6 para. 1 (art. 6-1) because the House of Lords ought to have granted him leave to appeal and because he considers the proceedings as a whole to have

    The Court considers that the applicant's complaint ought to be examined under Article 13 of the Convention in conjunction with Article 5 of the Convention, which guarantees the right to liberty