CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

6 954 résultats pour « Samir Lassoued »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-442432-443110

Admin. suprême

30 octobre 2001

30 octobre 2001

The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following 20 Chamber judgments (of which only the friendly settlements are final [1] ):   Section 1   (1)     Saki

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD002116706

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2011

20 décembre 2011

With the same judgment, the court released the applicant, taking into account the period she had spent in detention. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD005071709

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2012

17 janvier 2012

On the same date, the prosecutor’s office requested that the same court order the applicants’ detention pending trial for thirty days.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD003465603

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2009

22 septembre 2009

It has thus already lasted over twenty-one years before two levels of jurisdiction. 16.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2232398-2392876

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2008

17 janvier 2008

  The civil proceedings had so far lasted more than ten years and had not yet produced even a first instance decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3757

Admin. suprême

12 juillet 2005

12 juillet 2005

In those circumstances, the Court considered that the applicants could not claim an additional right to a separate civil action against the police officers allegedly involved in the same incident.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4006

Admin. suprême

15 février 2005

15 février 2005

As regards the complexity of the proceedings, the trial at first instance had lasted 313 court days, preceded by 28   interlocutory applications. The appeal hearing had lasted 23 days.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-195059

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2019

9 juillet 2019

The most serious such breach started during the night between 1 and 2 April 2016 and lasted until 5 April and involved heavy military clashes close to the border between the “NKR” and Azerbaijan (sometimes

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0308DEC004179205

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2018

8 mars 2018

The periods of enforcement in the applicants’ cases, save for Mr   Merkushev in application no. 68090/14 (see appended table below) lasted for no more than just over twelve months which do not appear

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1130JUD003556905

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2010

30 novembre 2010

    On 3 December 1996 the same plaintiff brought an action against the applicant before the District Court, challenging his disinheritance.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229885

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2023

30 novembre 2023

, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of fresh air; 0.3   sq.m; transfer on 04/10/2021 by train - 10 inmates held in the compartment; the transfer lasted

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0411JUD003008903

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2006

11 avril 2006

Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time. THE FACTS 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1112DEC003777097

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2002

12 novembre 2002

Consequently, on the same date, the court discontinued the proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0205JUD002273604

Admin. suprême

5 février 2008

5 février 2008

The Court observes that the proceedings had already lasted over seven months on that date. The period in question ended on 25 March 2004.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601JUD007147601

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2006

1 juin 2006

Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. THE FACTS 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1113DEC004811499

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2003

13 novembre 2003

On the same day the court held a hearing. On 28 April 1995 it granted the applicant’s subsequent request for exemption from the court costs.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-681224-688580

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2003

16 janvier 2003

  The Court also noted that the proceedings had lasted more than 35 years to date, including a period of more than 17 years after Greece had recognised the right of individual petition.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1007JUD000706005

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2008

7 octobre 2008

    The applicant complained that the proceedings had lasted an unreasonably long time. She relied on Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0326DEC006034710

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2019

26 mars 2019

During the investigation the prosecutor also arrested other suspects and charged them with offences allegedly committed within the same criminal gang.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-177247

Admin. suprême

31 août 2017

31 août 2017

On the same date he was placed in Krasnoyarsk remand prison IZ-24/1 (SIZO-1). On 18   June 2015 the Krasnoyarsk Regional Court upheld the judgment on appeal.

Source officielle

Page 54 sur 348

← PrécédentSuivant →