CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-442432-443110
30 octobre 2001
The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following 20 Chamber judgments (of which only the friendly settlements are final [1] ):   Section 1   (1)     Saki
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD002116706
20 décembre 2011
With the same judgment, the court released the applicant, taking into account the period she had spent in detention. 8.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD005071709
17 janvier 2012
On the same date, the prosecutor’s office requested that the same court order the applicants’ detention pending trial for thirty days.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD003465603
22 septembre 2009
It has thus already lasted over twenty-one years before two levels of jurisdiction. 16.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2232398-2392876
17 janvier 2008
  The civil proceedings had so far lasted more than ten years and had not yet produced even a first instance decision.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3757
12 juillet 2005
In those circumstances, the Court considered that the applicants could not claim an additional right to a separate civil action against the police officers allegedly involved in the same incident.
ECLI:CEDH:002-4006
15 février 2005
As regards the complexity of the proceedings, the trial at first instance had lasted 313 court days, preceded by 28   interlocutory applications. The appeal hearing had lasted 23 days.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-195059
9 juillet 2019
The most serious such breach started during the night between 1 and 2 April 2016 and lasted until 5 April and involved heavy military clashes close to the border between the “NKR” and Azerbaijan (sometimes
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0308DEC004179205
8 mars 2018
The periods of enforcement in the applicants’ cases, save for Mr   Merkushev in application no. 68090/14 (see appended table below) lasted for no more than just over twelve months which do not appear
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1130JUD003556905
30 novembre 2010
    On 3 December 1996 the same plaintiff brought an action against the applicant before the District Court, challenging his disinheritance.
ECLI:CEDH:001-229885
30 novembre 2023
, no or restricted access to potable water, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of fresh air; 0.3   sq.m; transfer on 04/10/2021 by train - 10 inmates held in the compartment; the transfer lasted
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0411JUD003008903
11 avril 2006
Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time. THE FACTS 4.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1112DEC003777097
12 novembre 2002
Consequently, on the same date, the court discontinued the proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0205JUD002273604
5 février 2008
The Court observes that the proceedings had already lasted over seven months on that date. The period in question ended on 25 March 2004.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601JUD007147601
1 juin 2006
Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. THE FACTS 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1113DEC004811499
13 novembre 2003
On the same day the court held a hearing. On 28 April 1995 it granted the applicant’s subsequent request for exemption from the court costs.
ECLI:CEDH:003-681224-688580
16 janvier 2003
  The Court also noted that the proceedings had lasted more than 35 years to date, including a period of more than 17 years after Greece had recognised the right of individual petition.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1007JUD000706005
7 octobre 2008
    The applicant complained that the proceedings had lasted an unreasonably long time. She relied on Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0326DEC006034710
26 mars 2019
During the investigation the prosecutor also arrested other suspects and charged them with offences allegedly committed within the same criminal gang.
ECLI:CEDH:001-177247
31 août 2017
On the same date he was placed in Krasnoyarsk remand prison IZ-24/1 (SIZO-1). On 18   June 2015 the Krasnoyarsk Regional Court upheld the judgment on appeal.
Page 54 sur 348