Before the Court, the applicants in both cases complained that, on the basis of the Government Decision, they and/or their predecessor had been deprived of their shares without compensation

They had been two young women in a position of inferiority to the officers depriving them of their liberty without explaining the reasons for their detention; they had been refused access to a lawyer or

In particular, the police officers had removed their clothes and kept them naked outside. Their hands had been handcuffed behind their heads and they had been forced to keep their legs wide open.

It is well known: the higher a person’s social status, the more society is inclined towards believing in the most absurd gossip about them, so they have to prove their innocence.

(h)   or if a person or a group resists the police and prevents them from carrying out their duties or if there is an attack against the police.” 19.

The UNHCR, who interviewed the applicants, considered that their links to the PMOI and their political opinions, as well as the treatment of PMOI members and sympathisers in Iran, put them at risk of being

When it was clear to them that their efforts remained without effect, they decided to file an application with the European Commission of Human Rights.

They then crossed the border into Iraq.

In their letter of 24 July 2017 the applicant’s legal representatives confirmed that the applicant had left Malta without informing them and that they had tried to contact him several times to no avail

The applicants have produced to the Court pictures taken on the day of their release showing their injuries.

As regards their conviction for fraud, they allege that, contrary to Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, they were found guilty of this crime after the statutory time-limit had expired. 5.

They further complained that the domestic authorities had failed to carry out an effective investigation into their allegations.

They alleged that they had not had at their disposal any procedure which would have allowed them to obtain a final decision before the date of the planned assemblies.

The police transferred them to the applicants for storage. The search for the truck is still going on.

The soldiers then entered the courtyard of the applicant's house and one of them asked the first applicant whether she was of Chechen origin.

These policemen told Leyla that her father had told the police that he had a package, which was likely to contain a firearm, and they asked her to give this package to them.

In this connection, they submitted that the applicants had not availed themselves of the civil and administrative-law remedies which could have provided reparation for the harm which they had allegedly

First, they complain about the action of 20 May 2003 and the fact that the authorities did not provide assistance to them despite the attempts of their parish priest and chairman of the church council

    The applicants complained that they had been deprived of their right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions as a result of the national authorities’ refusal to recognise them as the legal