CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1218JUD001421210
18 décembre 2014
The evidence obtained by the incitement should therefore have been excluded at his trial. 28.
Page 54 sur 1635
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-209251
19 mars 2021
Personal situation of the applicants (a) The applicants’ arrest and pre-trial detention 4.
ECLI:CEDH:001-193411
2 mai 2019
He alleges that the trial court ignored his request. At the court hearing on 18 January 2012, the applicant asked the trial court to release him from detention.
ECLI:CEDH:001-209255
Personal situation of the applicants (a) The applicants’ arrests and pre-trial detention 4.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4322
15 juin 2004
At a pre-trial hearing, the applicant’s counsel argued that the trial should be stayed as an abuse of process, because the applicant would not be able to understand fully and participate in the trial,
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0528DEC006731809
28 mai 2013
The final re-trial and appeal 7. Judge T was appointed to act as the trial judge and to conduct the trial on his own.
ECLI:CEDH:001-214415
23 novembre 2021
(b) Was the applicants’ pre-trial detention compatible with the requirements of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention?
ECLI:CEDH:001-214418
ECLI:CEDH:002-7062
15 juin 2000
the applicant’s right to a fair trial.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13763
30 août 2022
and implement measures designed to ensure the safety of those involved in such trials.
ECLI:CEDH:001-148871
19 novembre 2014
the record of the trial.
ECLI:CEDH:001-210461
17 mai 2021
Turkey 26/07/2018 Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention 4 37745/18 Balkaş v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0614JUD002083718
14 juin 2022
by a pre-trial judge.
ECLI:CEDH:001-210000
15 avril 2021
Turkey 13/06/2018 Length of pre-trial detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 21 32403/18 Şen v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-146469
27 août 2014
The trial court relied on the statement of B.H. given in the pre-trial proceedings in order to establish the applicants’ motive to commit the crime.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1103DEC006496201
3 novembre 2005
given at trial and where the witness was absent for reasons which made his or her attendance at trial impossible (Article 286 of the Code).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1205JUD004643509
5 décembre 2019
These witnesses all eventually attended the trial. 19 .
ECLI:CEDH:001-220900
17 octobre 2022
Türkiye 22/02/2021 Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention 75. 13133/21 Arslan v.
9e Chambre A
616282407a007b88ee15678f
5 septembre 2013
L'intimée soutient sans être sérieusement démentie que cette volonté de monsieur [B] de ne pas être salarié s'explique en outre par le fait qu'il disposait à l'époque dans les comptes de Tropical d'une
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0417DEC003804708
17 avril 2018
questioning at trial due to possible adverse psychological effects.