CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

10 526 résultats pour « Bessala »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1022DEC002812410

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2015

22 octobre 2015

The applicant complained in substance under Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention that he did not have a possibility to challenge his paternity as the prosecutor refused to file an action on his behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1209DEC003412304

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2014

9 décembre 2014

By a letter of 16 June 2014 his wife, Ms Ilinka Mladenovska, informed the Court about the applicant’s death on 22 July 2012 and about her intention to pursue the application on his behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-188940

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2018

4 décembre 2018

(see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, §§ 102-03, ECHR 2014, and Nölkenbockhoff v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-178153

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2017

27 septembre 2017

first ‑ instance court considered that the applicant had had the intention of creating propaganda material in favour of the MLKP when she filmed the event and that her acts were committed on behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0825DEC005107910

Admin. suprême

25 août 2022

25 août 2022

alleged heirs requesting a copy of an official document certifying that they were the applicant’s legal heirs and a duly signed authority empowering the representatives to act before the Court on their behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0406DEC002676821

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2023

6 avril 2023

The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.

Source officielle
CE

7ème sous-section jugeant seule

CETAT:CETATEXT000021646851

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2010

8 janvier 2010

déclaré vouloir s'inscrire en première année de licence d'arts plastiques à l'université de Rennes ; qu'elle justifie avoir effectué une première année à la faculté de Droit et de Sciences économiques de Bejaïa

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0825DEC004613213

Admin. suprême

25 août 2022

25 août 2022

By letter dated 22 February 2022, sent through the Court’s Electronic Communications Service (eComms), the applicant’s representative was invited to submit, on behalf of the applicant, the written observations

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2101

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2008

27 mars 2008

already been fully established on the basis of the parties’ statements and enclosed documents – notably the impugned contract – and that it had therefore been unnecessary to hear the witnesses called on behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1109DEC001398019

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2023

9 novembre 2023

The applicant’s lawyer was also invited to submit by 30 May 2023 written observations in reply on behalf of the applicant, together with any claim for just satisfaction.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-199539

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2019

29 novembre 2019

The Constitutional Court considered that, in a situation where the authority form accompanying the constitutional complaint empowered an attorney office (legal person) to act on the applicant’s behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203DEC004313720

Admin. suprême

3 février 2022

3 février 2022

The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0327DEC000860506

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2012

27 mars 2012

The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on the applicant’s behalf. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203DEC002169420

Admin. suprême

3 février 2022

3 février 2022

The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4729

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2003

2 septembre 2003

Before the Court, the applicant complains that the national authorities refused to intervene on his behalf in application of that Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415DEC003957311

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2014

15 avril 2014

The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on his behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0202DEC007220413

Admin. suprême

2 février 2023

2 février 2023

The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3729

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2005

20 septembre 2005

In the case of the third applicant, who worked for a private company that undertook projects on behalf of National Defence, his employer asked him to resign following a request by a military authority

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6887

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2000

6 avril 2000

In 1947, J.P., husband of the first applicant and father of the other applicants, had such an application lodged on his behalf for two plots of land he had formerly owned; the authorities did not reply

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110DEC001844507

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2012

10 janvier 2012

The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on the applicant’s behalf. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.

Source officielle

Page 55 sur 527

← PrécédentSuivant →