Mardi 27 avril 2011 : le Conseil Général de Meurthe et Moselle ; alerté par l'adjoint au Maire de Mercy le Bas, nous adresse une réclamation pour un arrêt à Mercy le Bas non effectué sur la ligne R030

MANTES LA JOLIE Expédition exécutoire Expédition Copie délivrées le : à : SCP JUPIN & ALGRIN SCP MERLE & CARENA-DORON REPUBLIQUE FRANCAISE AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LE ONZE SEPTEMBRE DEUX MILLE UN, PROROGE

PASSERA C/ Marc Z... représenté par la SCP BOYER-LESCAT-MERLE Christiane A... épouse Z... représentée par la SCP BOYER-LESCAT-MERLE Sandie X... représentée par la SCP B. CHATEAU - O.

However, the mere fact that a judge had already given decisions prior to a trial could not in itself justify fears as to his or her impartiality.

At the same time, it concluded that the case file clearly indicated that the applicant had used forged documents to obtain the reimbursement of expenses and that his use of money advanced by the company

The question in the present case was whether the second paragraph of Article 54 of Legislative Decree no. 112/2008 cast doubt on that finding in relation to cases concerning the length of administrative

The shortcomings in the present case in terms of safety had been such that they exceeded mere negligence on the part of army personnel in the locating and destruction of unexploded ordnance.

The facts of the case as a whole suggested that there was an evident causal link between the applicant’s private life and beliefs, on the one hand, and his transfer, on the other.

The Article   8 rights in issue in the present case were those of the applicant association, not of its members.

In 2006, however, the Rome Assize Court of Appeal, referring to the relevant case-law of the Court of Cassation, declared that the applicant should serve a life sentence, in application of Article 73 §

Moreover, several factors suggest that in this case the expulsion complained of had in fact been collective in nature.

The applicants’ cases have remained suspended before the first-instance courts ever since.

The instant case is therefore to be distinguished from cases concerning settled migrants, i.e. persons who have already been granted a right of residence in a host country.

In the case of S.J. v.

JL COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Audience publique du 26 septembre 2018 Cassation partielle Mme , conseiller doyen faisant fonction de président Arrêt n° 1318 F-D Pourvoi n° K

Ayant rappelé l'arrêt rendu par la cour de cassation et les conditions du contrôle, elle a fait valoir en substance qu'il convenait de déterminer l'assiette de l'octroi de mer et de l'octroi de mer régional

He had preferred to let time pass, however, and wait until the case came for trial on 30 April 1997 before pointing this out.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.