CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

6 954 résultats pour « Samir Lassoued »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0902DEC001652502

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2004

2 septembre 2004

At the same time, the Supreme Court quashed part of the judgment relating to the attempted murder and remitted the case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-199347

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2019

18 novembre 2019

The bombardment lasted for several hours. Some residents left the village; others hid in shelters and cellars.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0311DEC001566504

Admin. suprême

11 mars 2008

11 mars 2008

The applicant complains that the expropriation proceedings lasted an unreasonably long time and that his property rights were violated as he was unable to use his real-estate or obtain compensation in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0924JUD003915409

Admin. suprême

24 septembre 2013

24 septembre 2013

It thus lasted fifteen years and ten months before one level of jurisdiction. In view of such lengthy proceedings, this complaint must be declared admissible. 13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0201DEC000036010

Admin. suprême

1 février 2011

1 février 2011

The applicant sought judicial review of that decision and, at the same time, issued judicial review proceedings against SOCA in respect of its decision to enforce the extradition order.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020JUD003270502

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2009

20 octobre 2009

It also decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility (Article 29 § 3). THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119JUD002665408

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2010

19 janvier 2010

In the Government’s view the two sets of proceedings had not concerned the same environmental application throughout the proceedings. 24.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0205JUD000499802

Admin. suprême

5 février 2013

5 février 2013

    Separately, two of the applicant’s uncles (the three of them claimed ownership rights in common for the same real estate) brought civil proceedings seeking restitution in kind of the same

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-205150

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2020

17 septembre 2020

The beatings lasted for about 30 minutes, during which the applicant lost consciousness several times. Then the applicant was taken to a basement in the same compound.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1218JUD003913905

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2007

18 décembre 2007

Following the latter hearing, on the same day, it ruled that the termination of the applicant’s employment was null and void.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0708JUD001814505

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2008

8 juillet 2008

Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, the Court decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. 4.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1463549-1537002

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2005

4 octobre 2005

  Repetitive cases (in which the Court has reached the same findings as in similar cases raising the same issues under the European Convention on Human Rights) can be found at the end of this press

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0423JUD002136393

Admin. suprême

23 avril 1997

23 avril 1997

The shortest hearing of an unidentified witness lasted nearly two hours (46203); the longest about five hours (BRZ08). The hearings of witnesses Jansen and Koene each lasted a good five hours.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1021JUD004688106

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2010

21 octobre 2010

(a warden at the same weekend retreat), awarding them the same employment-related benefits, including the increase, as those claimed by the applicants in the present case ( Гж.бр.1746/2000 , Гж.бр.993/

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1126JUD001359105

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2009

26 novembre 2009

On the same day the applicant was arrested. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0620DEC005897712

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2023

20 juin 2023

    By judgments nos. 1425, 1426, 1427 and 1428 of 2008, delivered in identical sets of proceedings on the same day, the Consiglio di Stato reached the same conclusion on the basis of the same

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1816081-1917159

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2006

24 octobre 2006

    Repetitive cases   In the following cases the Court has reached the same findings as in similar cases raising the same issues under the Convention:     Violation of Article

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1777455-1879749

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2006

21 septembre 2006

  The Court noted that the proceedings in question had lasted more than 11 years.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0707DEC003778905

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2009

7 juillet 2009

On 13 February 2007 the Kharkiv Court of Appeal quashed it and remitted the case to the same first-instance court for fresh examination.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0319DEC003618697

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2002

19 mars 2002

In this connection, the only remedies to be exhausted are those which relate to the breaches alleged and at the same time are available and sufficient.

Source officielle

Page 55 sur 348

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.