The applicants were detained in the “special detention centres” for administrative arrestees in Kostroma and in the Kostroma Region.

Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Vasiliy Aleksandrovich Pimanov, is a Russian national who was born in 1986 and lives in the village of Bolshoye Selo of the Yaroslavl Region

:   Darian Pavli, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Peeter Roosma, judges, and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various

On 31 March 2008 the Balakhna Town Court of the Nizhniy Novgorod Region (the Town Court) found the applicant guilty and sentenced him to a term of imprisonment.

    On 12 June 2009 the Anninskiy Interdistrict Investigative Department of the Investigative Committee of the Voronezh Region was informed over the phone that at around 1.30 a.m.

-2 (UKh-16/2) in the Omsk Region; (h)     after 7 December 2010: correctional colony IK-6 in the Omsk Region. 8 .

    From January to May 2007 the applicant was detained in Iļģuciema Prison under a partly closed imprisonment regime. 27.

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention 5,000     65019/16 24/10/2016 Dmitriy Aleksandrovich Ivanov 27/08/1982 IK-1 Kostroma Region 22/09/2014

case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

    The Court notes that the applicants, who suffer from various disabilities, were kept in detention in poor conditions which did not satisfy their special needs.

    Meeting of 23 January 2007 The applicants are human rights activists living and working in the Krasnodar Region.

The applicants in applications nos. 30103/16, 54310/18 and 54188/19 also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention.

case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

The Court further reiterates its findings regarding the “open spaces” where prisoners were held in an open prison and the semi-liberty regime (see Zografos and Others , cited above, §§ 91-107).

On various dates between October 2017 and April 2020 the applicants’ relatives, all civilians (listed in the table below), were apprehended by representatives of the “Donetsk People’s Republic” (“DPR”)

regions of Russia.

case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

Court of the Novgorod Region).