société Energie Charente une autorisation unique pour la construction et l'exploitation d'un parc éolien composé de quatre aérogénérateurs et un poste de livraison sur le territoire de la commune d'Hiesse

It was of the view that this evidence could not possibly render lawful his statements, which in any event were exaggerated and offensive. 17.     The applicant appealed.

his partner.

He further complained about the length of the civil proceedings at issue, as well as the respondent State’s interference with his right to pursue his application before the Court. 4.

In his judgment Kallis J stated, inter alia , the following: “...

immediately after the event complained of so as to render his complaint manifestly ill-founded (compare and contrast Khudobin v.

His right leg was operated on twice, because after the first amputation his wound had become infected.

    The applicant lodged a fresh constitutional complaint, arguing that the admission of the evidence infringed his right to respect for his home under Article 13 of the Basic Law and his right

    The Court would further observe that it does not consider it necessary to decide whether the absence of the applicant and his counsel, taken separately, would render the proceedings before

LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué, que M.

On 8 November 2001 the Supreme Administrative Court rejected his appeal against the administrative court’s judgment.

On 23   March 2016 the applicant’s lawyer lodged another complaint challenging the lawfulness of his detention.

On 29 June 1998, they entered into a deed of separation by which the applicant undertook to pay weekly maintenance of 25 pounds sterling (GBP) for his daughter.

On 19 April 2001 the Social Appeals Court rejected the applicant’s renewed request to render a single decision on his claims since July 1995.

    In his submissions of June 2009, the applicant complained, in addition, about a number of other events involving himself and his relatives in the period between 1999 and 2006.

His counsel was not present. The applicant met his counsel in private for the first time later that day. 11.

The applicant argues that these links will be assumed by the Turkish authorities in his case given his family ties with his brother I. who is referred to as the right-hand man of the PKK leader, the applicant's

The first applicant stressed that when imposing the sanction, the authorities had failed to balance the public interests with his right to respect for his family life with his son and wife. 32.

According to him, he was told on several occasions that different versions of his son’s killing existed, and that they all needed to be verified – for example, that his son had been shot at by a rebel

Au nom du Peuple Français COUR D'APPEL DE DOUAI CHAMBRE 7 SECTION 2 ARRÊT DU 26/ 05/ 2011 Requête en rectification d'erreur matérielle No MINUTE : No RG : 11/ 02201 Arrêt (No 10/ 05045) rendu