CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0324DEC004512306
24 mars 2009
The applicant became a party to the proceedings on 30   January   2004. The question therefore arises whether the applicant can complain about the overall duration of the proceedings.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11558
27 juin 2017
The Bar Association subsequently became aware of his previous conviction which he had failed to mention in his application.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0608DEC002376205
8 juin 2010
This decision became final on 22   December 2004. Having regard to the cumulative sentence and to the one relating to the first conviction, he was liable to detention for altogether 47 months.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0830DEC002184304
30 août 2005
penalty to the applicant was "most unfair", because if he had not alerted the authorities to the fact that someone had tampered with the cord which closed the vehicle, the authorities would never have become
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-68054
22 décembre 2004
appendix to this resolution, delivered on 7 February 2002, 21 February 2002, 19 March 2002, 28 January 2003, 8 April 2003 and 27 May 2003 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once they had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56014
17 décembre 2001
the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Krčmář and others case delivered on 3 March 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:002-978
1 avril 2010
As he had waived his right to appeal, the judgment became final on the same day.
ECLI:CEDH:001-102058
15 septembre 2010
judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgment in this case, transmitted by the Court to the Committee once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56335
6 janvier 2004
of the European Court of Human Rights in 6 cases, details of which appear in the appendix to this resolution, delivered on 28 March 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once they had become
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1125JUD003739821
25 novembre 2025
    STRASBOURG 25 November 2025   FINAL   25/02/2026     This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.
ECLI:CEDH:001-71146
26 octobre 2005
Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Wessels-Bergervoet case delivered on 4 June 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:002-3859
10 mai 2005
During the investigation the Prime Minister called a press conference and issued a press release stating, inter alia , that days before a judgment of the Court of Appeal, it “[had] become known” that contacts
ECLI:CEDH:001-56331
22 juillet 2002
Court of Human Rights in the 11 cases, details of which appear in the appendix to this resolution, which were delivered on 25 September 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once they had become
ECLI:CEDH:002-13866
8 novembre 2022
Eventually, he was not sanctioned since the prosecution became time-barred.
ECLI:CEDH:001-81510
20 juin 2007
Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the A.T. case delivered on 21   March 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-101029
execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee once it had become
Pôle 4 - Chambre 1
625bae6744cde4277d1bd5b2
15 avril 2022
à payer à la SCI Becarre la somme de 2 500 euros sur le fondement de l'article 700 du code de procédure civile ; - condamné la société Becarre à payer à la société Progerep et à la société Bureau Veritas
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0506DEC000755906
6 mai 2014
On 28   December 2006 the judgment was upheld by the Briansk Regional Court and became final and enforceable. It was executed on 17 September 2007.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1218JUD001397903
18 décembre 2008
This judgment became binding on 31 January 1998. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0405JUD002009803
5 avril 2007
The judgment became final on 22 May 2001 when the Krasnodar Regional Court upheld it on appeal. The judgment remains unenforced because the Council does not have necessary funds. B.
Page 57 sur 1474
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.