for his detention. 11.

It was also mentioned that several of the acts suggested ongoing corrupt behaviour on his part despite the detention of a number of his accomplices.

had had to do with his desire to convert his life sentence and that C had been motivated by seeking to avoid his own prosecution for A’s murder.

The applicant’s honesty could not be viewed as a factor working in his favour as long as his honesty was the result of his being caught in the act, and of the clear evidence against him. 11 .

  Everyone has the right to respect for his private and       family life, his home and his correspondence.         2.

He stated that substantial personal setbacks had caused him to resume his abuse.

Furthermore, the lawyer acting on his behalf could not assume the position of a “party” in the proceedings had he applied to act as his lawyer in addition to being his legal representative since this would

The Court observes that the applicant’s motive for asylum was his alleged arrest and the torture to which he was subjected as a consequence of his participation in the demonstration on 27 March 1995.

LA COUR DE CASSATION, PREMIÈRE CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Joint les pourvois n° W 07-21.115 de la société Editions Montparnasse et n° X 07-21.553 de la société Lobster films qui

The domestic court had explained to him that the rules of criminal procedure did not require his presence at the hearing and that he could authorise his lawyer to attend the hearing on his behalf.

Article 5 § 3 of the Convention imposes a presumption that an accused be freed while he awaits his trial; ... certain evidence, which may have been sufficient earlier to justify [detention] or to render

The court ordered his release pending trial. 14.

    The applicant complained, in particular, about his home search and seizures of documents as being in breach of his rights under Articles 8 and 13 of the Convention. 4.

mental condition and his ability to be educated.

With regard to his complaint, he emphasises that the unjustified interference with his right is not the seizure but the confiscation of his published books.

his views in such a society.

He was represented by his lawyer, K., and repeated his confession statements.

His personal medical file stated that, “the patient has a police escort and is complaining of a slight headache. His overall condition is good... he is conscious and can respond to questions.”

, to his or her release.

    In April 2005 his illness worsened. 8 .