Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-186726
11 septembre 2018
11 septembre 2018
He also claims that the use of his various writings, interviews and articles as evidence for his criminal conviction amounted to a violation of his freedom of expression. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-153586
9 mars 2015
9 mars 2015
He explained that he had stopped to look for a friend’s phone number when his aggressor had come at him and started hitting him. He had lost consciousness and woke up later in the hospital.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1970:0724DEC000426069
24 juillet 1970
24 juillet 1970
THE LAW Whereas, in regard to the applicant's complaint that he could not defend his case in court because the summary penalty was imposed on him without an oral hearing and because his appeal
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0907JUD006825011
7 septembre 2017
7 septembre 2017
He argued that there was no incentive for him to abscond. The strength of his ties to Germany rendered his absconding to Turkey unlikely.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-194113
28 mai 2019
28 mai 2019
The applicant complains, under Article 3 of the Convention, that the disappearance of his father, who had been taken by the Croatian soldiers in August 1995 and whose fate remained unknown, caused him
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0828DEC004245698
28 août 2001
28 août 2001
The applicant later informed his girlfriend that M. had gone to throw a brick at him and that he had ducked, swerved and hit M.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-110603
9 mars 2012
9 mars 2012
The applicant alleges that the District Court revealed to public the information about his HIV infection.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-246039
13 octobre 2025
13 octobre 2025
The applicant is a human rights activist, and the accusations against him were mainly related to his acts during the Gezi Park events occurred between May and September 2013 in Türkiye (for further information
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1969:1215DEC000356668
15 décembre 1969
15 décembre 1969
The trial finally took place on 30th July, 1966, and the applicant complained that A gave repeated proof of his hostility against the applicant and his determination to convict him.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0329DEC001124903
29 mars 2007
29 mars 2007
According to the applicant, after his arrest, instead of going directly to the police station, the police officers took him to the forest, where they allegedly beat and threatened him to make him confess
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-311
10 novembre 2011
10 novembre 2011
convicting him.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1209DEC002936107
9 décembre 2008
9 décembre 2008
COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention that his detention during criminal proceedings against him had breached the “reasonable time” requirement and that his request
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0629JUD003951311
29 juin 2021
29 juin 2021
At the police station, the applicant gave his consent to having blood samples taken from him.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1967:0601DEC000229164
1 juin 1967
1 juin 1967
If this had been considered as not sufficiently precise, the Court should have given him a chance to specify his request.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-146063
10 juillet 2014
10 juillet 2014
On 7 December 2001 the Sibiu Prosecutor’s Office indicted the applicant in his absence and sent his case to trial on the basis of documentary and testimonial evidence and the applicant’s and his co-accused
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0309DEC003611704
9 mars 2010
9 mars 2010
He called Mr A.A. from my phone asking him to come in his car ...
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6246
15 novembre 2001
15 novembre 2001
On the first day of trial the applicant sought leave to defend himself, but his request was allegedly refused by the court. A lawyer was therefore officially assigned to represent him.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-976
20 avril 2010
20 avril 2010
On an unspecified date he lodged a complaint against his compulsory detention. On 24 April 2003 the public prosecutor’s office returned the complaint to him.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0210DEC001082411
10 février 2015
10 février 2015
The applicant argued that the conduct of the prison authorities after his arrest on 7 November 1999 had caused his health to deteriorate and left him unable to work.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1108JUD000216912
8 novembre 2022
8 novembre 2022
According to him, A. Nazaryan insulted him during their conversation, in response to which he hit A.
Source officiellePage 57 sur 3277