CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

19 549 résultats pour « Leneel »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0907DEC004780011

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2017

7 septembre 2017

Their overall length is thus five years, ten months and twenty-four days for three levels of jurisdiction.

Source officielle

Page 57 sur 978

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1129DEC002609614

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2018

29 novembre 2018

Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Representative’s name and location Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction 26096/14 31/03/2014 István Szekrényes

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1105DEC006340819

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2020

5 novembre 2020

Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction 63408/19 22/11/2019 Attila Csaba

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1505

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2009

25 juin 2009

Supreme Commercial Court under new Code of Commercial Procedure: effective remedy   The applicants lodged an application with the European Court more than six months after a decision at cassation level

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11907

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2017

7 novembre 2017

However, the starting point for lodging an appeal was interpreted in different ways at national level: it was either the date on which a short form of the decision was read out at the hearing, or the date

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0602DEC000895620

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2022

2 juin 2022

Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction 8956/20 01/02/2020 Denis Mikhaylovich

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:002-2106

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2008

18 mars 2008

The Court had to determine whether the nuisance had attained the minimum level of severity required for it to constitute a violation of Article 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0504DEC002650622

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2023

4 mai 2023

Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth/registration   Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction 26506/22 24/05/2022 Alex KOLOMPÁR 1992 25/03/2019  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1209DEC000688020

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2021

9 décembre 2021

Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction   6880/20 25/01/2020 Elvira KOVÁCS

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-552

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2011

12 avril 2011

With regard to the conditions of detention in Rahova Prison, even assuming that the occupancy level of the applicant’s cell had satisfied the requirements of Article   3, the sanitary conditions and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0224DEC003472012

Admin. suprême

24 février 2022

24 février 2022

name Year of birth   Representative’s name and location Start of proceedings or date of entry into force of the Convention in respect of Montenegro (3 March 2004) End of proceedings Total length Levels

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006DEC002768919

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2022

6 octobre 2022

Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction 27689/19 14/05/2019 Borys Yaroslavovych OSTAPYUK 1961 25/12/2014 &

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006DEC002711221

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2022

6 octobre 2022

  Date of introduction Applicant’s name   Year of birth Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length   Levels of jurisdiction 27112/21   18/05/2021 Stepan Igorovych DOROSH &

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0123DEC005109822

Admin. suprême

23 janvier 2025

23 janvier 2025

Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth   Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction 51098/22 19/10/2022 Radojka GARDAŠEVIĆ 1960 24/07/2018   07/04

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0929DEC006280519

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2020

29 septembre 2020

Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth   Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction 62805/19 27/11/2019 Lilla KALINCSÁK 22/03/1990 28/09/2010   13

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620DEC003067015

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2019

20 juin 2019

Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of birth Start of proceedings or date of entry into force the Convention in respect of Serbia (3 March 2004) End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11780

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2017

19 décembre 2017

That required a certain level of public exposure, which was not the case for the applicant, who was an ordinary member of a Christian circle (contrast with the position in the Court of Justice of the European

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0516DEC004641022

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2024

16 mai 2024

Date of introduction Applicant’s name Year of birth Representative’s name and location Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction 46410/22 13/09/2022 Mykhaylo Yevgenovych

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0514DEC002213716

Admin. suprême

14 mai 2020

14 mai 2020

Date of introduction Applicant’s name Date of registration   Representative’s name and location Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction 22137/16 11/04/2016 HORTOBÁGYI

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13678

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2022

7 juin 2022

applicant could not prove that he had an interest conferring standing on him to seek judicial review of the tacit decisions, but that the municipality did have such an interest, “having regard to its level

Source officielle