CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 577 résultats pour « Policella »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0627JUD002183702

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2006

27 juin 2006

    On 29 March 1993 the applicant, a border policeman, was charged with bribery and fraud, allegedly committed with another accomplice.

Page 57 sur 79

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0220JUD000315015

Admin. suprême

20 février 2018

20 février 2018

The case file shows that on 24 April 2014 [a policeman apprehended the applicant]. The police report indicates that [he] had been harassing underage persons   ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0616JUD006065400

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2005

16 juin 2005

    Les requérants soutiennent que, le matin du 6 mars 2002, la première d’entre eux, Svetlana Syssoyeva, fut convoquée à la Direction régionale de la police de sécurité ( Drošības policija )

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0731JUD006502201

Admin. suprême

31 juillet 2007

31 juillet 2007

La direction de la police d'État ( Valsts policija ) de Liepāja fut chargée de l'exécution de cette ordonnance, devenue effective dès le moment de son prononcé. 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0628JUD004468607

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2011

28 juin 2011

found his car damaged when he had returned to the parking lot from a nearby restaurant in order to fetch some cash, whereas the police asserted – based on the testimony of an eye witness, an off-duty policeman

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-117466

Admin. suprême

18 février 2013

18 février 2013

However, a policeman only recorded one hematoma on the applicant’s back. The examination took place in the presence of one of the officers who had ill ‑ treated the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1974:0708DEC000585272

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 1974

8 juillet 1974

The applicant was again released in 1966 (after prior medical reports stated that he was not mentally disordered) but sent back to prison for allegedly trying to strangle a policeman.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0630JUD006974713

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2016

30 juin 2016

    On 19   July 2013 the Internal Security Office of the State Police ( Valsts policijas Iekšējās drošības birojs ) dismissed a complaint by the applicant that police officers had taken

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0727JUD004372602

Admin. suprême

27 juillet 2006

27 juillet 2006

Thus, for example, in the former case a policeman or police officer who is in litigation with the authority employing him on grounds of the insalubrious condition of his official residence could not, on

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1472302-1544866

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2005

11 octobre 2005

  A policeman named G.R. lodged a civil action for defamation against the applicant and the publishing office of the newspaper with the Centru District Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0720JUD000292619

Admin. suprême

20 juillet 2023

20 juillet 2023

SOSNOVSKAYA 1993 Molokanova Tatyana Valeryevna Moscow On 10/08/2019 the applicant participated in demonstration for fair elections to Moscow Duma, during which she was punched in the stomach by a policeman

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0111JUD004929006

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2022

11 janvier 2022

On 15 November 2008 an investigator again refused to open criminal proceedings against the policeman.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0209JUD003648013

Admin. suprême

9 février 2021

9 février 2021

    On 4 January 2011 the applicant’s brother, Mr Sergey Laptev (“SL”), who at the time worked as a policeman, was arrested on suspicion of rape.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1012DEC002832003

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2004

12 octobre 2004

The Government also called into question whether the applicant had at all been arrested and tortured in Bangladesh, and the police's alleged interest in him, drawing attention to the lack of medical examinations

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0104DEC000855908

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2011

4 janvier 2011

In 1993, following a review of the prosecution’s duty of disclosure, 4,000 “actions” in the criminal investigation, which were contained in the police’s “Holmes” computer system, were disclosed to the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0618DEC003410807

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2013

18 juin 2013

allocation questionnaire which was necessary to progress a civil case once a defence had been received and there was no support for the applicant’s allegation that the CLCC had lost the Metropolitan Police’s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-161087

Admin. suprême

1 février 2016

1 février 2016

According to the police’s version of events, Sh. and D. had joined the applicant and his friends later, during the apprehension of the applicant, after he had been stopped by the traffic police. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1125DEC004357298

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 1999

25 novembre 1999

    On 13 October 1995 the investigating judge ordered that Y be consigned to his mother's care, if need be, with the police's assistance.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0405DEC005816913

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2022

5 avril 2022

    The Court observes that the applicant failed to show that those remedies could not ensure proper scrutiny of the police’s actions and afford adequate redress for any violation that might

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0709DEC002152493

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 1993

9 juillet 1993

        The applicants state that they are prevented by the Swedish secrecy rules from commenting on their membership in the PKK and on the Swedish security police's observations

Source officielle