It thus lasted for about seven years and two months for three levels of jurisdiction.

Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time. 5.

On the same day Zh.   acquired for himself a new flat on the October Boulevard.

  The Court noted that the disputed proceedings had lasted six years and two months.

It has thus lasted, to date, more than seven years and four months for two levels of jurisdiction. A.     Admissibility 17.

He was released on the same day at 1.15 p.m. 51.

He did so on 14   February 1996, at the same time extending his claim for damages to CZK 30,000 (EUR 955). 23.

It noted that the proceedings in question had lasted to date for almost seven years and two months.

    On 1 December 2009 the applicant pointed to the above-mentioned judgment and requested a decision to the same effect. 18.

On the same date the applicant requested the Białystok Appellate Prosecutor to set this decision aside.

The proceedings in question had therefore lasted five years and eight months.

Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time. 4.

In the same decision the court held that the file be transferred to the Develi Assize Court.

This request was rejected by the Court of Appeal on the same day without any reasoning.

It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article   29 § 3). THE FACTS 4.

    By separate decisions of 30   March   and 13   July   2005, the same court awarded the applicant additionally UAH   306. 16.

  Repetitive cases (in which the Court has reached the same findings as in similar cases raising the same issues under the European Convention on Human Rights) can be found at the end of this press

However, he considered that the same reasoning could not apply to tips which were built into payments made by cheque or credit card to their employer since the amounts became the latter's property.

In a decision delivered on the same day the court of appeal upheld the applicant's conviction and sentence.

At the same time the applicant’s son, having left his car in the middle of the highway without the required alarm signalling being set up, violated the road safety rules.