1 thereto about the non-enforcement of the judgment of in his favour. THE LAW The applicant complained under Article   6 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol   No.

the moment when the situation with the applicant’s parental authority would have changed, the applicant should pay monthly one fourth of her salary or any other income as child maintenance for S. in favour

He also maintains that the judge spoke in favour of the prosecution.

In particular, did the quashing on 12 May 2016 of the final judgment in the applicant’s favour violated the principle of legal certainty enshrined in Article   6 §   1 of the Convention? 2.

and concerning the partial quashing of a final judgment in favour of the applicant by way of supervisory review in the case of Azaryev .

be illusory if a Contracting State’s domestic legal system allowed a final, binding judicial decision – creating an established right to payment or to have certain actions taken in the applicant’s favour

On 8 November 2001 the Buiucani District Court ruled in favour of the applicants and awarded them the entire amount claimed.

On 23 April 2004 the Belgrade Fourth Municipal Court adopted a judgment in the applicant’s favour according to which DP “Teleoptic- Žiroskopi”, a socially-owned company based in Zemun, was ordered to pay

    The case concerns the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment given in the applicants’ favour against private individuals. 2.

The applicants complain under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the non-enforcement of the decisions in their favour and under Article 13 of

    The applicant complained of the non-enforcement of a domestic decision issued in her favour against the City of Bihać.

On the same day the prosecutor filed an indictment with the Diyarbakır Assize Court, charging the applicant with disseminating propaganda in favour of the PKK/KONGRA-GEL [1] under section 7(2) of the Prevention

THE LAW The applicant complained under Article 10 of the Convention that his conviction for the crime of disseminating propaganda in favour of a terrorist organisation based on the posts he had shared

    The applicant complained of the delayed enforcement of the domestic judgment given in his favour and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.

TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE [Localité 7] 6ème chambre civile N° RG 21/04925 - N° Portalis DBYH-W-B7F-KKIC N° : DH/MD Copie exécutoire : Copie : Délivrée à : la SELARL CABINET LAURENT FAVET

Portalis DBVM-V-B7E-KNDP N° Minute : Copie exécutoire délivrée le : Me Michel PICCAMIGLIO la SELARL CABINET LAURENT FAVET

COMPLAINTS All the applicants complain about a violation of the principle of legal certainty on account of the quashing by way of supervisory review of binding and enforceable judgments in their favour

Three levels of jurisdiction found in his favour and awarded him part of the amount claimed.

The Sentence Enforcement Board gave a unanimous opinion in favour of the applicant’s release on licence and his probation and rehabilitation officer was likewise strongly in favour.

    The applicants complained of the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment given in their favour and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in that regard.