Since he had not made his request in the terms referred to above, the committee considered that his pardon did not satisfy the regulatory requirements in force and was therefore invalid.

His act, which had consisted in a single blow with a knife, had essentially been defensive, in spite of his words after the fight.

  At no time, either on his arrest or during the trial proceedings, did the applicant give any explanation for his presence in the house. 20.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, DEUXIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le moyen unique : Attendu, selon les énonciations des juges du fond, que le 20 février

In his submissions (running to 49   pages) he argued that his right to respect for his family life and his right to be heard as guaranteed by the Basic Law had been violated by the fact that and the

late, which rendered the presence of his lawyer impossible.

near his house.

    It has not been submitted that after the dismissal of his claims in the second set of proceedings, the applicant retained any chance of restoring his shareholding. 64.

    On 21 December 1998 the applicant lodged his first appeal against his detention.

On the same date the court rejected an application by the applicant for his release on bail and authorised his detention pending the above-mentioned investigations. 24.

family and his own social rehabilitation...

re-assessment of his taxes, while making no mention of possible surcharges.

fireside in his own home.

    The applicant appealed against his conviction.

' - courrièl de Mme [Y] en date du 18 octobre 2016 à 8h13 : ' je n'étais déjà pas en forme hier et ça se confirme : j'ai un genre de gastro, day-off aujourd'hui, je vais voir le médecin.

Moreover, in his view, his detention altogether had lasted an unreasonably long time, in breach of Article 5 § 3.

    The applicant alleged that his right to a fair trial had been violated in that the appeal hearing in his criminal case had been held in his absence. 4.

          In December 1980 the applicant offered to render "social services" in order to enable his case to be closed, if only conditionally.

to call his next-of-kin. 18.

          In December 1980 the applicant offered to render "social services" in order to enable his case to be closed, if only conditionally.