CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0709DEC001564622
9 juillet 2024
Lastly, in their observations submitted in case no.
Page 58 sur 819
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1214JUD005577215
14 décembre 2023
In the case of Muradverdiyev v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0904JUD000828023
4 septembre 2025
In the case of Tatič v.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-138458
22 octobre 2013
The circumstances of the case 2.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0114REP002395794
14 janvier 1998
MARXER, B. CONFORTI AND C.
comm
61372425cd58014677412d67
17 mars 2004
X... et à la SCI La Cadière du désistement de leur pourvoi en ce qu'il est dirigé contre M. le greffier en chef de la cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence ; Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué, que par acte sous-seing
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619DEC002055610
19 juin 2018
The circumstances of the case 3.
ECLI:CEDH:001-203424
13 mai 2020
However, in such cases, the assessment of the relevance and prevalence of the public interest must in any case be carried out again ...” Constitutional Court case-law 21 .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1207JUD002748002
7 décembre 2010
had had to abstain from carrying out major renovation works and by the changes in the land configuration caused by the works carried out in 1979. 27.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1005DEC003621897
5 octobre 2004
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0525DEC001884103
25 mai 2004
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CEDH:001-164549
8 juin 2016
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CEDH:001-242976
31 mars 2025
In so doing, he complains, in particular, that the original deprivation of his late father’s property was not carried out in accordance with the law at the material time.
ECLI:CEDH:001-246030
14 octobre 2025
Romania , no. 38798/13, §§ 147 and 148, 18 March 2025)? 3.
ECLI:CEDH:001-228794
12 octobre 2023
The case was returned to the first instance court for a fresh examination. On 2 March 2021 the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court rejected the applicant company’s action.
ECLI:CEDH:001-237924
9 octobre 2024
of the investigation carried out into his allegations.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207DEC002343512
7 décembre 2021
The case concerns allegations of the applicant’s ill-treatment in breach of Article 3.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4256
6 juillet 2004
margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law
ECLI:CEDH:001-218169
3 juin 2022
Another seized document reported about a demonstration which had taken place in Barcelona on 19 March 2017.
ECLI:CEDH:001-216654
3 mars 2022
2022 SECOND SECTION Application no. 58901/19 Naci KURKUT against Turkey and 6 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 3 March 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern