/1996 and 112/1999) read as follows: Section 180(1) “Responsibility for loss caused by death or bodily injury or by damage or destruction of another’s property, when it results from violent acts or terror

The applicant was taken to the anti-terror branch of the Ankara Security Directorate, where he was allegedly kept in a cell with four other persons and subjected to verbal abuse.

  A report was drafted at the scene of the incident by four members of the Anti-Terror Department.

    On 1 November 2009 the applicant’s police statement was taken at the Anti-Terror Branch of the Istanbul Security Directorate, in the presence of his lawyer.

    On 8 December 2016 the applicant was detained on charges of membership of the organisation described by the Turkish authorities as FETÖ/PDY (“Fetullahist Terror Organisation/Parallel State

, owing in particular to the fact that the reporting judge’s report had not been communicated to him, although it had been made available to the advocate-general; neither had he been informed of the tenor

offence was among those listed in Article   100 § 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (“catalogue offences”), severity of the potential sentence, the fact that the ISIS organisation resorted to terror

On 27 May 2001 the applicant’s statement was taken by two police officers at the Anti-Terror Branch of the İzmir Security Directorate. 15.

on account of the failure to communicate the reporting judge’s report to the applicants prior to the hearing, whereas it had been sent to the advocate-general, and the failure to inform them of the tenor

/1996 and 112/1999) read as follows: Section 180(1) “Responsibility for loss caused by death or bodily injury or by damage or destruction of another’s property, when it results from violent acts or terror

occupation, orders: ... the killing, torture or inhuman treatment of civilians; ... the infliction of grave suffering on or injuries to the bodily integrity or health of civilians; ... measures of fear and terror

The Public Prosecutor requested that the applicants be convicted and sentenced under Article 168 of the Turkish Criminal Code and Article 5 of the Anti-Terror Law.

On the same day he was taken into custody by the police officers from the Anti-Terror Branch of the Diyarbakır Security Directorate ( Terörle Mücadele Şubesi ) on suspicion of his involvement in the PKK

and Public Demonstrations (hereinafter: the Liability Act; section 1 § 2 of that Act defines a “terrorist act” as an act of violence committed for political reasons with a view to stirring up fear, terror

indictment, certain passages of the article depicted the PKK [1] as part of the Kurdish intellectual movement and hence constituted propaganda of the organisation, known for employing violence and terror

rise to the present application, the applicant was detained in Çanakkale Prison on charges of membership of an armed terrorist organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “ Fetullahist Terror

application, the applicant had been in pre-trial detention in Sincan T-Type Prison on charges of membership of an armed terrorist organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “ Fetullahist Terror

    By an additional judgment dated 4 May 2004, the Ankara State Security Court, taking into account the amendment to the definition of “terror acts” under section 7 of Law no. 3713 pursuant

    On 14 December 2015 the applicant was placed in pre-trial detention in Sincan F-Type Prison on suspicion of membership of a terrorist organisation (Fetullahist Terror Organisation/Parallel

was held in the Menemen Closed Penal Institution (“the prison”) on account of his conviction for membership of an armed terrorist organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terror