Article 6 §§ 1 and 3(d) read in relevant part: “1.

    Accordingly, there has been a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention. 3.     Alleged violation of Article 6 § 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention 56.

) (Article 6-3 - Droits de la défense;Article 6 - Droit à un procès équitable);Violation de l'article 5 - Droit à la liberté et à la sûreté (Article 5-1 - Arrestation ou détention régulière)

Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3

    In view of this, the Court holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention in conjunction with Article   6 §   1 in the present case. 2.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 25.

    Similar facts and complaints have already been examined in Huseynli and Others and Huseynov and Others in which the Court found a violation of Article 6 § 3 taken together with Article 6

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 OF THE CONVENTION 45.

des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne, de l'article 6 § 3 du TUE et de l'arrêt de la CJUE du 9 juin 2022, a sursis à statuer jusqu'à la décision de cette dernière et a réservé les dépens. 6.

He relied on Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention. 43.

    The applicant relied on Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c), which reads as follows in the relevant part: “1.

rééducation comportementale   »   : article 6 applicable Article 6-3 Droits de la défense Absence de garanties procédurales adéquates dans une procédure ayant abouti au placement d’un enfant

6 § 3 (d) of the Convention.

    Accordingly, there has been a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 of the Convention. 54.

    Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (b), (c), and (d) and Article 13 of the Convention provide, in so far as relevant, as follows: Article 6 “1.

    The Court notes that the complaints under Article 6 are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention.

Partiellement irrecevable;Violation de l'article 6 - Droit à un procès équitable (Article 6 - Procédure pénale;Article 6-3-c - Se défendre avec l'assistance d'un défenseur;Assistance gratuite d'un avocat

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (d) OF THE CONVENTION 45.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) OF THE CONVENTION AS A RESULT OF THE DECISION TO HOLD PART OF THE TRIAL IN CAMERA 46.

    The Court therefore finds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 in conjunction with Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention. 48.