The applicant challenged this order, but his detention on remand was confirmed by the District Court on the basis of strong evidence of guilt found against him and the serious risk of his re-offending.

He had then struck B.J. with a hammer which he always carried with him. When M.K. had tried to escape, the applicant had hit her with a hammer several times.

On several occasions during that time the second applicant was brought to help him with his physical needs. In the car the first applicant had charges brought against him.

The applicant also alleges that chief officers of the Raikivska Correctional Colony threatened him with death for having lodged his application with the Court.

However, they all agree that they had to drag him along, supporting him under the shoulders and then carrying him, and that his head was hanging down.

prepare his defence and that it was impossible for him to examine witnesses against him.

On 30 January 2007 the applicant, in his name and on behalf of his company, made a request for the release of the property.

During the trip, the applicant threw away his boots and his gloves, as he had realised that other passers-by could have seen him and implicated him in the incident. 10.

The applicant stated that the injuries had been inflicted after his arrest on 17   June 2006 by police officers who had punched him in the head and different parts of his body and beaten him with

    On the occasion of a fourth procès-verbal being drawn up against him, the person concerned would be heard by a police sergeant about his disruptive behaviour and the reason for his (continued

activities for the child, to inform him of the child’s movement within the Russian Federation and to obtain his written consent for the child’s trips abroad, as well as to enable him to spend additional

The applicant declined his offer and invited him to leave his medical documents in the office and wait outside.

The child stated that he preferred to live with his father and that his mother had been threatening him and had forbidden him to call his father. 22.

When the applicant protested his innocence, the police chief threatened him. The applicant was then handcuffed and taken back to his cell.

Efforts on the part of the Commission's Secretary to obtain further information from him as to his complaints had failed, a letter of 6th April, 1967, sent to the prison at Kassel where the applicant was

S.N. swore at the applicant, kicked him in his abdominal area, and punched him.

His new wife had married him only to get hold of his property part of which had already been transferred to her.

carried out; -     during the applicant’s transfer to the prison hospital on 26 July 2016, his wounded leg had not been held in a fixed position as required, which had caused him severe physical

the court to let him meet his legal-aid counsel and to obtain the attendance of his father.