On 9   July   2013 the Lutsk City District Court allowed the eviction claim, finding that the applicant had lost his legal grounds for occupying a room in the military servicemen

The Government argued mainly that the applicants had lost their victim status because they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law   no.

administrative practice of torching and looting of houses in the “buffer zone”: the Court’s case-law had developed a flexible approach regarding the evidence to be provided by applicants who claimed to have lost

The Government argued mainly that the applicants had lost their victim status due to the fact that they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law no. 169/2017 amending and completing Law no. 254/2013

du travail de NOUMEA (RG n° :22/17) Saisine de la cour : 02 Décembre 2022 APPELANT Mme [V] [O] née le 19 Novembre 1985 à [Localité 3] demeurant [Adresse 2] Représentée par Me Séverine LOSTE

As it was directly enforceable, the applicant became ineligible and lost her seat on the City Council.

that the applicant's claim in the domestic proceedings concerned his eviction from an apartment, to which he had been entitled as an army officer before the independence of Slovenia, but afterwards lost

on 29 October 2003 the applicant company requested the return of a sum of money it had paid as a deposit to enable it to participate in the privatisation procedure; it stated that it had “completely lost

lodged a cassation appeal (a copy is not available in the case file), complaining that the domestic courts’ judgments dismissing his claims, in particular in respect of the destroyed appliances and lost

Par un mémoire en défense, enregistré le 3 juillet 2022, la SARL Spahr 25, représentée par Me Loste, s'en remet à la sagesse du tribunal et demande qu'aucune somme ne soit mise à sa charge au titre de

They noted in this connection that Ukraine had lost effective control over the Crimea in February 2014 and since then had had no access to the data stored on that part of its territory. 12.

    The Government refused to settle the case and submitted that the applicant had lost the victim status as he had received compensation for non-pecuniary damage and interest for the alleged

The Government argued that for some periods of their detentions (see the appended table) the applicants had lost their victim status because they had benefited from the remedy offered by Law no. 169/2017

At the same time, the restriction on accessing particular websites had not been aimed directly at internet users, but they had lost, within a very short period of time, unhindered access to , inter alia

poursuites et diligences de ses représentants légaux domiciliés en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 3] [Localité 1] (ALLEMAGNE) Représentée et plaidant par Me Jean-Michel LECLERCQ-LEROY de la SELARL LOUETTE-LECLERCQ

PARTIES EN CAUSE : Monsieur [K] [S] né le [Date naissance 1] 1993 à [Localité 7] (60) de nationalité Française [Adresse 2] [Localité 3] Représenté par Me Jean-Michel LECLERCQ-LEROY de la SELARL LOUETTE-LECLERCQ

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Mullié, - les observations de Me Le Louet, substituant Me Al-Shaman, représentant M.

Francis, demeurant "Le Carrefour", Moze-sur-Louet à Rochefort-sur-Loire (Maine-et-Loire), 308/ Mme J... Marie-Josèphe, demeurant place d'Armes à Nueil-sur-Layon (Maine-et-Loire), 318/ M. Q...

documents ou échanges de correspondances contenant les mots clés suivants : PIERREDON IMS HARDY IKXIA ROSTICHER ACTION PLUS HOFFMANN Y&H CONSEIL ET PATRIMOINE PR2H [A] L'HERITIER BONNEAU CLAUZADE CAUSSE LOUSTA