decisions: -     prohibiting to leave the place of domicile and residence save in exceptional circumstance and with its authorisation; -     prohibiting public gatherings comprising more

Invoking Article 2 of Protocol no. 4, the applicant complains about the restriction of his freedom of movement and alleges more specifically that such a restriction was not in accordance with the law.

after he had written an article in which he mentioned that it was probable that N.T. would be a candidate deputy in the future national elections given that “according to information, he will be once more

The applicant company (more precisely, the assets of the wound up company) complains that the domestic authorities violated its rights guaranteed under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.

Under that law, private schools could not increase their fees by more than 7% compared with the previous school year, on pain of a fine.

with the applicant’s right to respect for his private and family life, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention, on account of his inability to have his personal status regularised for more

The proceedings therefore lasted more than one year and eight months, for one level of jurisdiction.

0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Note d’information sur la jurisprudence de la Cour 18 Mai 2000 Moore

The applicant complains under Article 3 of the Convention that, while serving his prison sentence, he has been precluded from undergoing eye surgery for more than two years, which can irreversibly affect

Those proceedings are still ongoing and presently have lasted more than 10 years and 5 months at three levels of jurisdiction (including two remittals).

The applicant complains under Article 8 of the Convention about the delay in the enforcement of the final judgment in question which prevented her from seeing her child for more than 4 years and, in particular

[M], [X] [T] Président [Adresse 2] Comparant en personne assisté à l'audience par Me Laura MORE [Adresse 3] COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL Décision contradictoire et en premier ressort.

The domestic court of first instance took its decision of 17 November 2015, by which it ordered the applicant’s preventive detention to continue, more than five months after the expiry, on 3 June 2015,

  The Government are invited to provide information and supporting documents on the material conditions of the applicant’s detention throughout the entire period of detention mentioned above, more

In particular, the applicant alleges that excessive force was used against him, that the ensuing investigation was lengthy (it lasted for more than six years), that it was conducted by officers of Riga

Investigating judge and prosecutors characterised facts as offence of embezzlement of public funds - applicant convicted by Audiencia Provincial of more general offence of simple embezzlement - but sentence

M.’s age (twelve years) were developing more and more a mind of their own and attempted to assert their will against that of their parents. J. M. felt disadvantaged by his father vis-à-vis P. and A.

The number of members then increases by one per further hundred employees, and in work places with more than thousand employees by one per further four hundred employees.

Later that day more clashes took place in Yerevan between the law enforcement authorities and the opposition supporters, which continued until late at night resulting in ten deaths and numerous injured

Such interests had to be very special, more or less unique, and should be applied restrictively. According to the Board, no such interests were applicable in the present case.