On 24 and 28 October 1993 respectively the applicants were taken into custody by police officers from the anti-terror branch of the Istanbul Security Directorate on suspicion of membership

On 26 November 1999 the İzmir public prosecutor decided not to prosecute the police officers at the anti ‑ terror branch of the İzmir Security Directorate.

there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 because: the reporting judge’s report had not been communicated to the applicant prior to the hearing, whereas it had been sent to the advocate-general; the tenor

  The Court noted that the applicant had been able to lodge observations with the Court of Appeal on the tenor and findings of the medical expert’s report.

The ill ‑ treatment had been administered with a view to extracting a confession related to a terror attack – the explosion of a block of flats in Magnitogorsk. 7.

  The applicants     Around 2.00 a.m. on 17 May 1998, members of the Anti-Terror Team of the Batman Security Directorate surrounded the applicants’ houses in Batman.

;   The steadily increasing summary executions, collective detentions      and disappearances of detainees, particularly since the recent      Anti-Terror

If the German State, within the framework of international anti-terror laws, took on the task of prosecuting alleged criminal acts that had been committed abroad, and if the proceedings were delayed by

ces dettes du couple, il a payé seul les sommes suivantes : - Crédit COFINOGA 932,99 € - Crédit SOFINCO 5 363,47 € - Caisse d'épargne n°7527386 2 984,56 € - Caisse d'épargne n°7527388 2 984,56 € - Teos

    On 9 October 1994 the applicant was arrested by police officers from the Anti-Terror branch of the Istanbul Security Directorate in the course of a police operation carried out against the

       As to Article 3, he refers to the inhuman and degrading treatment to which he was subjected by having to choose between spying and being killed, leading to his terrorisation

Les requérants étaient actionnaires d'une société anonyme Companhia das Lezírias do Tejo e Sado S.A.R.L. («   la CL   »).

    On 23 February 1999 the applicants were arrested and taken into custody by police officers from the Anti-terror branch of the Kuşadası Security Directorate.

    On 4 June 1999 the applicants were arrested by police officers from the anti-terror branch of the Diyarbakır Security Directorate on suspicion of being members of Hezbollah.

    On 3 February 1998 police officers from the anti-terror branch of the Istanbul Security Directorate conducted a search at the Gaziosmanpaşa district office of the HADEP, where they found

However, this was precisely the tenor of the criticism directed at the complainant.

violation of bodily integrity or health; dislocation or displacement or forcible conversion to another nationality or religion; forcible prostitution or rape; application of measures of intimidation and terror

If the case is a large-scale and complex terror investigation, with a significant number of uncertainties, a wide description could well be sufficient (ibid.).

applicants, on suspicion of being involved in the attempted coup d’état that took place on 15 July 2016 and membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as FETÖ/PDY (“Fetullahist Terror

    On 22 September 2016 the applicant was detained on charges of membership of the organisation described by the Turkish authorities as FETÖ/PDY (“ Fetullahist Terror Organisation/Parallel State