CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
civ2
60794ea19ba5988459c48f43
26 octobre 2006
leur pourvoi incident que le 25 mai 2005 ; D'où il suit que le pourvoi n'est pas recevable ; Sur le moyen unique du pourvoi principal et le moyen unique du pourvoi incident de la société Banque Thémis
Page 59 sur 6767
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0131DEC003573304
31 janvier 2006
However, due to their fear of the Wahhibis, the applicants had neither reported the kidnapping to the police, nor had they sought hospital treatment for the first applicant.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0407DEC002102292
7 avril 1994
Moreover, there was a "genuine and serious" dispute between them and the Austrian authorities regarding the suitability of their plots of land for building purposes, whereby the question of the lawfulness
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1005JUD003898418
5 octobre 2021
The officer had checked their documents, then the boot of the car and, given that everything had been in order, had let the car pass.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0518DEC003571297
18 mai 1999
They complain that the absence of adequate protection of their privacy against the public broadcast of a BBC television programme filmed on their private island denies them the protection required
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0206DEC003901597
6 février 2003
In this context, and regard being had to the fact that the applicants had spent a very short time in Bulgaria, did not have strong ties there, and could practice their religion in Austria, the Government
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710JUD002750407
10 juillet 2012
Then they ordered the applicants’ relatives to get up and took them outside one by one. The officers did not let the other family members leave the room they were in. 14.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113076
5 mai 2009
Furthermore, the applicants complain under Articles 2 and 8 of the Convention about the failure of the authorities during all these years to provide them with any information concerning the excavation
ECLI:CEDH:001-110081
2 février 2012
They invoke Article 13 of the Convention, claiming that there is no effective domestic remedy available to them whereby they could have their allegations under Articles 2 and 3 examined.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1105JUD003654897
5 novembre 2002
They agreed to buy it when their employer gave them the opportunity to do so because they had no alternative accommodation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0706DEC001071510
6 juillet 2010
The applicants also claimed that since the 1974 Turkish intervention in northern Cyprus they had been deprived of their property rights, as their property was located in the area that was under the occupation
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0706DEC000047907
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705DEC000020916
5 juillet 2016
They argued, inter alia, that their statements could not have led the Deputy Minister to conclude that because there had not been a lengthy process leading up to their conversion then that conversion was
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0920JUD000038703
20 septembre 2012
They threatened him and then hit him and pushed him inside the house. The attackers then set the house on fire and left, barring the door. 6.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-765640-779961
3 juin 2003
When they defaulted on the loan repayments, the bank brought proceedings for their properties to be sold at auction.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1180569-1231906
9 novembre 2004
This was refused by the Court of Appeal on the ground that their acquittal was merely technical and that, had they been charged with the lesser crime of threatening to commit a crime directed against life
ECLI:CEDH:001-109653
9 janvier 2012
They all testified that they had not ill-treated the applicant and that they had handcuffed and shackled him in the cell for his own protection and the protection of the property because he had been drunk
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0302DEC006708601
2 mars 2006
They complained under Article 6 of the Convention that they had been wrongfully convicted on the basis of inadmissible evidence and that their sentences had been too severe; that they had had inadequate
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0622DEC005487900
22 juin 2006
The security forces had not destroyed the applicants’ village or forced them to leave their homes.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0706DEC002952295
6 juillet 1999
The Inspectors indicated their readiness to co-operate although they reserved the right to conduct their investigations as they thought right.