B C, aussi connu sous l'identité de Mohamed Amrouche, a été admis au bénéfice de l'aide juridictionnelle totale par une décision du 26 janvier 2024. Vu les autres pièces du dossier.

: inadmissible The applicant complained, inter alia , about the amount of the old-age pension and additional social benefits she received from the social security authorities.

The amount allegedly due by the applicant was of 5,115.62 RON (approximately EUR 1,140), of which 2,664.44 RON was the main debt, the remainder of the amount including interest, execution costs and other

appeared as unpaid and embezzled a total amount of EUR 2,740.94.

- How was the disputed amount of the excess pension payments calculated in the applicant’s case?

Article 184 Determining maintenance as a fixed amount “1.

The amount of the debt was linked to the exchange rate of the United States   dollar.

Under section 43 of the Act the amount of child allowance paid could not be less than the amount of the minimum subsistence level established by law.

for expropriation at TRY 2,515, in other words, three times that amount.

On 30 April 2012 a new decision was issued recognizing his right to a disability pension as of 5 July 2010, but in a lower amount as a disabled civilian.

This amount was reviewed and increased in 1984 and 1986. The final amount of compensation was initially determined in 1988.

  1 after confirmation of the amounts by court decisions.

Noting the admissions contained in the Government’s declarations as well as the amounts of compensation proposed – which are consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases (see Patricolo and Others

It was excessive to take the overall amount claimed as the amount in dispute, because the ensuing court fees would exceed the amount he could realistically expect to obtain.

B..., représenté par Me Amrouche, demande au juge des référés : 1°) de l’admettre au bénéfice de l’aide juridictionnelle provisoire ; 2°) d’ordonner, sur le fondement des dispositions de l’article

not be regarded as a liability that was “certain and of a fixed amount” and could not be recovered by enforcement procedures.

of Appeal for the assessment of the final unit amount for compensation, claiming that the amounts awarded by judgment no. 1885/2002 were excessive.

At the same time, the court refused to award the overpaid amount to the applicant company finding that the refund was possible only following a decision of the customs authorities.

he had paid in so far as it exceeded the basic amount required for a retirement pension?