The applicant’s mother was hit on her back with a rubber truncheon; the servicemen talked to them in a rude and offensive manner. They then left, having closed the gates from the outside.

They settled together with their husband/father in the village of Karinskoye, in the Odintsovski district of Moscow city. 6.

The latter started shouting abuse at the eleven shepherds, beating them with their rifle butts, kicking them and slapping them on the face. Then they separated the women from the men.

A deportation order was served on them in August 1998 and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs again confirmed that they did not meet the criteria for refugee status.

  They submit that as a result of the refusal of legal aid and of the provisions of the Legal Aid Act 1974, they will be unable to recover their costs.

There was no evidence showing that they were of Yezidi origin and that they were persecuted when they had left their country nor was there a sufficient likelihood that they would be persecuted if they

The McCallum claimants had in fact relied on the Regulations in their particulars of claim, and there was no reason to consider them ineffective in the circumstances of the case. 17.

They denied the allegations against them and stated that the empty cartridges found at the scene of the crime had been placed there by their enemies in order to implicate them in the crime.

On 28 May 2009 the Swedish Government informed the Court that the applicants had said that they were willing to cooperate in their return to Serbia.

On 26 September 1997 the Deputy Minister informed the children that they were not allowed to await the outcome of their objection in the Netherlands.

The servicemen told the applicants that they would release him after a check; the applicants kept begging the men to release their relative and the servicemen beat them with rifle-butts.

After a suspension of the hearing, which gave them sufficient time for consideration, they had declared to waive their right to appeal with the consent of their counsel. This waiver was irrevocable.

In this connection, they submitted that, although there was no official decision restricting their right to freedom of movement, they had been unlawfully prevented from leaving the country.

As a result of the Georgian army’s shelling of their town in August 2008, the applicants submit that they had to take shelter in the basement of their property and remain there for three days without access

After standing there and waiting for some time they decided to cease their participation in the event, but could not leave the venue and remained at the pavement.

They asked the MP to help them and to make all necessary applications on their behalf. The MP spoke to the local governor on the telephone and asked for help.

They were stopped by the soldiers, who asked them for their identity documents.

They submitted that there were strong humanitarian reasons against separating them by deporting them to different countries. Furthermore, their yet unborn child would need both parents.

They were first taken to the Çarşı Police Station. The police officers forced them to cover their heads with their jackets but the witness was able to see through the parting of his jacket.

They argued that the bearer shares had been transferred to them by a mere handover, as specified under the then applicable rules, after 27 October 1994, the date of their production.