Croatia,   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,   Erik Møse,   Ksenija Turković,   Dmitry Dedov, judges

FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 32897/12 Arnold TREIAL against Estonia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 28   January 2014 as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle

In consolidating government finances, larger contributions will be raised from those who have traditionally not carried their fair share in the tax burden.

CROATIA   (Application no. 20824/09)                 JUDGMENT     STRASBOURG   31 October 2013       FINAL   31/01/2014 &

Croatia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,  

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 16   November 2010 as a Chamber composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   Renate Jaeger,   Rait Maruste,   Isabelle

Article 6 of the Convention, in so far as relevant, reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing within a reasonable time.

Article 6 § 1 of the Convention reads, as far as relevant, as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal

Croatia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Julia Laffranque,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,  

as relevant, as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing within a reasonable time by [a] ... tribunal ...”

In so far as relevant, these Articles read as follows: Article 6 § 1 “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal ...

Croatia (dec.), no. 28369/07, 30 September 2010). 31.

Croatia , no. 48101/07, § 43, 1 July 2010). 33.

Croatia (dec.), no. 28369/07, 30 September 2010). 40.

Citing a number of the Court’s judgments, against Ukraine, Croatia, Romania and Slovakia, they argued that such award would be in line with the Court’s practice in similar cases. 35.

Croatia , no. 15766/03, § 33, 17   July 2008). II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE CONVENTION 18.

The applicant submitted that a fair balance had not been struck in the decision to refuse him a re-opening of the paternity proceedings.

of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Rait Maruste, President,   Karel Jungwiert,   Anatoly Kovler,   Renate Jaeger,   Mark Villiger,   Isabelle

Croatia , no. 66485/01, § 69, 13 November 2003).