CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0709JUD006914312
9 juillet 2020
  39199/98, 26   July 2005). 30.
Pôle 6 - Chambre 7
6035fdf9656c90632dc3fcae
14 janvier 2016
d'un ticket « Bon Appétit Party », la valeur d'un repas offert pouvant représenter jusqu'à 100€.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0630JUD002580304
30 juin 2009
According to the Constitution, a party may only be considered a party if it is the expression of political pluralism.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13184
18 mars 2021
Therefore Article 6 § 1 of the Convention applied to proceedings involving civil-party complaints from the time when the complainant became a civil party, unless he or she had waived the right to reparation
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-165325
1 juillet 2016
At the material time, the applicant was the president of the Ergani district branch of the DTP (Party for a Democratic Society).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0228DEC002178493
28 février 1995
Before receiving a reply, he was transferred back to Patras.
ECLI:CEDH:002-5581
10 juillet 2012
In 2010 the Supreme Court found the way in which the applicant party put its convictions into practice in nominating candidates for election to general representative bodies unacceptable.
ECLI:CEDH:001-192057
1 mars 2019
2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns an alleged failure of the State to assist the applicant in enforcement of a judgment against a private party (Article 6 § 1 of the Convention).
ECLI:CEDH:002-7206
12 octobre 2000
In July 1991 she sought provisional measures which resulted in her being awarded a certain sum in October 1991.
ECLI:CEDH:001-244667
21 juillet 2025
The seizure measure was adopted on 15   July 2020 and is still in force.
ECLI:CEDH:001-230934
11 janvier 2024
Russia [Committee], nos. 50271/06 and 8 other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in the appeal hearing
ECLI:CEDH:001-117476
21 février 2013
The applicant was, at the time of the events, a politician and a member of a parliamentary opposition party. 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD005135707
21 juin 2016
The applicant applied to join these proceedings as a civil party seeking damages. 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0205JUD003293513
5 février 2026
On 26   August 2008 the Economic Court of Appeal accepted the request and annulled the final judgment of 5   July 2005, because a third party affected by the judgment (the political party) had
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0412JUD001297607
12 avril 2011
Party of Russia”. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1123JUD008365417
23 novembre 2023
  50271/06 and 8   other applications, §   35, 2 July 2019) Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0328DEC003838602
28 mars 2006
On 30 July 2002 the Decision Enforcement Department returned the enforcement warrant without execution.
Chambre 9 cab 09 G
69dd347ecdc6046d471ec09d
7 avril 2026
] ont conclu avec la SAS LES DOMAINES DE PATRAS un contrat de privatisation des domaines DE PATRAS du 8 au 10 octobre 2021 afin d’y célébrer leur mariage, au prix de 17 470 euros.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1108JUD001886007
8 novembre 2016
    On 27 July 2006 the amendments to the Yabloko national party charter were registered with the Federal Registration Service, upon which date they came into force. 14.
ECLI:CEDH:002-5332
11 juin 2002
: violation Facts : The applicants were members of the Turkish Grand National Assembly and a political party, the DEP (the Democracy Party - Demokrasi partisi ), which was founded in May 1993.
Page 6 sur 1057