The total length was three years, one month and eighteen days.

    The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

    The applicant maintained that the length of his pre-trial detention was excessive and unreasonable. (b)     The Government 34.

;   Viktoriya Maradudina   Diana Kovatcheva   Acting Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX Application raising complaints under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention (excessive length

Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the applicant’s pre-trial detention was excessive. 9.

    The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

    On 2 June 2014 the complaint concerning the length of pre-trial detention was communicated to the Government and the remainder of the application was declared inadmissible.

    On 1 October 2014 the complaint concerning the length of pre-trial detention was communicated to the Government and the remainder of the application was declared inadmissible pursuant to

    The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention. He also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

    On 24 May 2004 the Court decided to communicate the complaint concerning the length of the proceedings to the Government.

    The applicant complained of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention. THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5   §   3 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

    The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 6.

    The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.

    The present application concerns mainly (i) the length of and reasons for the applicant’s pre-trial detention under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention; (ii) whether there was a breach of the

These factors contributed to the length of the proceedings and therefore had an impact on the length of the applicant’s detention.

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention)

    The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.

Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-3 - Length of pre-trial detention)

    The applicants complained of the excessive length of their pre-trial detention. THE LAW JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 5.

    The applicant complained about the length of his pre-trial detention.