AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Cour d'Appel
6253c935bd3db21cbdd8794e
19 mai 2005
19 mai 2005
de la vente par la SA Anciens Etablissements Branger (AEB), à la SARL Technique de Sciage au Diamant (T.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0327DEC004802710
27 mars 2018
27 mars 2018
It did, however, explicitly pursue its action to push Le Bridge aside and – logically – to take its place.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-56121
21 octobre 2002
21 octobre 2002
the same day to the Committee of Ministers; Recalling that the case originated in six applications (Nos. 23878/94 to 23883/94) against Turkey, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 11 March
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3156532-3515030
8 juin 2010
8 juin 2010
Mr Khaindrava applied to the Prosecutor General on 10 March 2004, requesting him to bring criminal proceedings.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-174297
17 mai 2017
17 mai 2017
s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } Communicated on 17 May 2017 FIRST SECTION Application no. 12261/15 CROATIA BUS d.o.o. against Croatia lodged on 3 March
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0310DEC005533900
10 mars 2005
10 mars 2005
On 18 March 1996 she lodged a motion with the District Court to have her full parental rights restored.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102DEC002136907
2 novembre 2010
2 novembre 2010
On 19 March 2003 he applied for the right to decide where the child should live to be transferred to him as the mother was neither able to bring up the child nor to enable contacts between
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0827JUD001275087
27 août 1991
27 août 1991
In March 1978 it repudiated these contracts and refused to pay him the agreed remuneration. 9.
Source officielleciv1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2013:C100650
30 mai 2013
30 mai 2013
X... a engagé une action en responsabilité et en garantie contre la SCP Larguier-Aimonetti- Blanc-Bringer-Mazars, avocat, et l'assureur de celle-ci, la société Allianz IARD, reprochant à son conseil d'avoir
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0302DEC002049292
2 mars 1994
2 mars 1994
xa0; against Cyprus The European Commission of Human Rights (Second Chamber) sitting in private on 2 March
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1120DEC001469214
20 novembre 2025
20 novembre 2025
Following the March 2009 amendments, the agreement no longer included specific technical requirements regarding the quality of the coal to be supplied.
Source officiellePôle 5 - Chambre 1
67f753d8eb05d6bf6564d9d4
9 avril 2025
9 avril 2025
brins de cordage pour résoudre le problème de friction des brins de cordage identifié par l'appelante ; qu'en réalité, la pièce en U de la poulie ROPEYE vise à éviter que les brins de cordage de fixation
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7492
26 mars 2013
26 mars 2013
When the applicant lodged a new request to bring a private prosecution, this was refused without examination of the merits as the prosecution had become time-barred.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1210DEC003980922
10 décembre 2024
10 décembre 2024
Giurgiu, a lawyer practising in Baia Mare; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0312DEC007192801
12 mars 2002
12 mars 2002
He was told to bring all the documents relating to his case in England and was given an appointment for 14 July 1998.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0518DEC005505016
18 mai 2021
18 mai 2021
On 23 March 2016 the applicant’s request for reopening was refused, by three votes to two, by the Supreme Administrative Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13184
18 mars 2021
18 mars 2021
margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 249 March
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-95491
30 septembre 2009
30 septembre 2009
super; color:#0069d6 } Resolution CM/ResDH(2009)92 [1] Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Kaiser against Switzerland (Application No.17073/04, judgment of 15 March
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-108308
2 décembre 2011
2 décembre 2011
ResDH(2011)254 [1] Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Iosif and others against Romania (Application No. 10443/03, judgment of 20 December 2007, final on 20 March
Source officielleChambre Sociale
62cd0f11e91c8e9fcf0712f1
11 juillet 2022
11 juillet 2022
La lettre de licenciement énonce que le magasin n'était pas destinataire sur la boîte RM des récépissés Brinks.
Source officiellePage 6 sur 448