CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0208JUD003128021
8 février 2024
solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2ADFDB { text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; list-style-position:inside } .sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0111JUD000169819
11 janvier 2024
} .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s74818F78 { margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; font-family:Arial; list-style-position:inside } .sE7B3A78A { width:1.99pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1123JUD000071118
23 novembre 2023
'; display:inline-block } .s51DFF5CF { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:34pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .sE5BF05B1 { width:2.33pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0711JUD000036818
11 juillet 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0116JUD000456223
16 janvier 2025
In view of the findings in paragraphs 9-11 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with that remaining complaint. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE   41 OF THE CONVENTION 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0122JUD001905421
22 janvier 2026
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0718JUD002702318
18 juillet 2024
margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:3pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; list-style-position:inside } .sE7B3A78A { width:1.99pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1201JUD000270318
1 décembre 2022
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0226JUD000226417
26 février 2026
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710JUD004584017
10 juillet 2025
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0306JUD004712022
6 mars 2025
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0430JUD004899013
30 avril 2026
'; display:inline-block } .sE8F2C496 { width:5.11pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sAB798EC2 { width:3.78pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sF0C78780 { margin-top
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0206DEC007299101
6 février 2007
He also submitted that the ordinary courts should examine whether the application of its internal rules by the Roman Catholic Church was in accordance with the generally binding legal rules.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0201JUD002628519
1 février 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0326JUD002977918
26 mars 2026
:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sAB798EC2 { width:3.78pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s90114CF2 { margin-top
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0928JUD002811495
28 septembre 1999
He lived in the town of Roman until his death on 13 March 1998. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1113JUD005651615
13 novembre 2025
    The Court will therefore continue to deal with the case at her request. For convenience, however, it will continue to refer to Mr Dadin as the applicant in the present judgment.
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2019:C110267
9 mai 2019
résidence Claudie depuis la décision du premier juge, le bénéfice de l'avantage fiscal escompté dans le cadre du montage initial n'apparaît pas avoir été perdu pour les époux K... , mais simplement décalé
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0627JUD002086418
27 juin 2024
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0711JUD003340917
Page 6 sur 98