On 22 February 1999 the same court decided to exclude a judge at the Regional Court from the examination of the applicant’s case.

On the same day the applicant was brought before a public prosecutor and then before the duty judge at the Istanbul State Security Court.

That same day, twenty-three migrants were arrested and charged in court in relation to the riot.

Following proceedings which lasted for ten years and involved six examinations, on 1 April 1997 the Court of Cassation granted the suit.

The remaining applicants raised the same allegations in respect of their relative.

    On 18 February 1996 the applicant complained to the Ministry of Justice that the proceedings lasted unreasonably long while the same court had proceeded with the new owners’ actions for eviction

The same day Mr Wabl, speaking at a press conference, accused the newspaper of “Nazi journalism”, a statement which was quoted in the Austrian media.

  Government’s preliminary objection (application inadmissible on account of friendly settlement reached before Commission in connection with an earlier application concerning length of same proceedings

  Government’s preliminary objection (application inadmissible on account of friendly settlement reached before Commission in connection with an earlier application concerning length of same proceedings

The applicant complains that the judicial proceedings that lasted in total for eight years before the domestic courts were in breach of the reasonable time requirement, as provided under Article 6 of the

Additionally, under the same provision, the application concerns an alleged violation of the applicant’s right to a trial within a reasonable time, given that the proceedings before the domestic courts

At the same time, the third applicant was acquitted. The applicants’ pre-trial detention had lasted for 3 years and 3 months in all.

Thus, the period to be taken into consideration lasted more than eleven years.

Poland - 54729/00 Judgment 2.3.2010 [Section IV] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Impartial tribunal Successive performance by the same judge of investigative and judicial duties in respect of

On the same day Nasimi District Court remanded the applicant in custody for three months.

parties in the case on the same matter and the same grounds.

On the same day she was asked to comment on the charge. On 3 March 1995 the applicant filed her comments.

In this connection the applicant's counsel found out that another person who was under suspicion for the same crime had been detained by the same District Court on 13 June 2004.

In this connection, the Court notes that at that point the proceedings had lasted over three years at one level of jurisdiction. 20.

  The Court finds no grounds to distinguish this objection in substance from the one that had been raised in the Sali case (see Sali   v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia , no.