.s8ADCD53C { width:135.42pt; display:inline-block } .s5D826FD4 { width:25.88pt; display:inline-block } .s1B61D60 { width:156.43pt; display:inline-block }       THIRD SECTION CASE OF SMIRNOV

{ margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }       THIRD SECTION CASE OF ROMANENKO AND SMIRNOV

GAN ASSURANCES [Adresse 13] [Localité 9] défaillante Société GROUPE SMISO MUTUELLES DES CADRES [Adresse 14] [Localité 6] défaillant Madame [K] [T] [Adresse 1] [Localité 8] représentée par Me Anaïs

In particular, were the applicants afforded sufficient procedural safeguards against interference with professional secrecy (see Smirnov v.

2 months, and 8   days); (b)   EUR 1,050 to Mr Galimov for his pre-trial detention “between 21   September 2010 and 1 August 2011” (10 months and 10 days); (c)   EUR 1,500 to Mr Smirnov

sBB6163A7 { width:2.48pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 58303/09 Sergey Igorevich SMIRNOV

Case Judgment of Final on 10543/03 LEONOV 26/01/2017 26/01/2017 38683/06 ALEKSANDR SMIRNOV 15/07/2010 15/10/2010 30075/06 ZAMFERESKO 15/11/2012 15/02/2013 38833/03 KIRPICHENKO 02/04/2015 02/07/2015 43109

    “Smirnov” testified that he was an occasional cannabis smoker and that he had collaborated with the drugs police.

in the instant case and to the Court’s findings in previous cases concerning the restrictions on prison visits and the lack of effective remedies for that complaint (see, as recent examples, Andrey Smirnov

    In particular, was the search and seizure carried with sufficient safeguards against interference with professional secrecy (see Smirnov v.

    The case of Mr Smirnov 6.     The second applicant was born on 29 May 1971 and lived, prior to his conviction, in Samara.

A..., représenté par Me Smira, demande au tribunal : 1°) de l’admettre à l’aide juridictionnelle provisoire ; 2°) d’annuler l’arrêté du 1er avril 2026, par lequel le préfet des Hauts-de-Seine

(Voir aussi Smirnov c.   Russie , 71362/01, 7 juin 2007, Résumé juridique   ; Wieser et Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH c.

between the demands of the general interest and the requirement of the protection of the applicant’s right to peaceful enjoyment of his possessions, as required by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Smirnov

Germany , no. 41604/98, § 45, ECHR 2005 ‑ IV; Smirnov v. Russia , no. 71362/01, § 44, ECHR   2007‑VII; and Dragan Petrović v. Serbia , no. 75229/10, §§ 69-73, 14 April 2020)?

  Smirnov 34 .     La requête n o   50645/16 a été introduite le 15 août 2016 par Aleksandr Gennadyevich Smirnov.

margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .sA4BC3E2E { font-family:Arial; font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }       THIRD SECTION           CASE OF SMIRNOV

  In the case of Smirnov and Others v.

width:175.61pt; display:inline-block } .s576DFC5F { width:15.93pt; display:inline-block } .sAA5C5B93 { width:187.63pt; display:inline-block }     FIFTH SECTION       CASE OF SMIRNOV

Russia (no. 21851/03) Sergey Smirnov v.