CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

205 305 résultats pour « intention de noter »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202887

Admin. suprême

14 mai 2020

14 mai 2020

On what basis subsequent case law could silently overtake this clear original intention is not obvious.”

Source officielle

Page 6 sur 10266

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001608290

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2009

22 septembre 2009

    No force was used against demonstrators who did not intrude into the “TRNC” border area and, in the case of demonstrators who were arrested for violating the border, no more force was used

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0602JUD006156108

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2016

2 juin 2016

She uses not only words but intonation, communicating non-verbally as well ... Of course, she is such a professional ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0416JUD004121408

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2019

16 avril 2019

The court concluded that the defendants’ intention was not to inform the public but rather to spread negative information about the plaintiff.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0126JUD002238619

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 2023

26 janvier 2023

The judgment insisted that the legislature had had the clear intention of not automatically recognising the eligibility for a survivor’s pension of all members of a stable couple, but only the eligibility

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-168336

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2016

10 octobre 2016

The applicants could not be faulted for accepting that assertion and it could not be said that nothing new subsequently emerged to warrant a decision to no longer accept the Government’s claim.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0214DEC005343499

Admin. suprême

14 février 2006

14 février 2006

Such transactions could be executed with the intention of not paying any tax. From 16-18 November 1992, there was a tax inspection concerning the transfer of shares from the applicant’s company.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710JUD004644309

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2012

10 juillet 2012

The conditions for liability under section 26 of the Damage Compensation Act no. 50/1993 had not been fulfilled.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0625JUD006831713

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2020

25 juin 2020

It further notes that it is not inadmissible on any other grounds. It must therefore be declared admissible. B.     Merits 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1011DEC005084199

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2001

11 octobre 2001

It is not for them to decide.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1012DEC002899903

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2010

12 octobre 2010

The journalists' intention had not been to defame the applicant but to bring those facts to public attention. It concluded that the journalists had not acted in bad faith. 37.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0625JUD008102412

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2020

25 juin 2020

It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible. Merits 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0203JUD000410024

Admin. suprême

3 février 2026

3 février 2026

In such circumstances the court accepted the respondent’s argument that he had acted under the belief that the dialogue with the journalist had been private and that his intention had not been to make

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0725JUD004889899

Admin. suprême

25 juillet 2001

25 juillet 2001

The first idea was that if the Communists did not manage to gain power through the ballot box, they could do so by forcing the lock in the courts. There was no shortage of material.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0521REP001330887

Admin. suprême

21 mai 1992

21 mai 1992

  In the light of the parties' reactions, the Commission now finds that there is no basis on which a friendly settlement can be effected.   C.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1120JUD001784991

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 1995

20 novembre 1995

sole responsibility for steering the ship and its manoeuvres", the Conseil d'Etat suggested that the word "responsibility" be replaced by the term "in command" since it seemed that "the Government's intention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0925JUD001319187

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 1992

25 septembre 1992

He cannot be acquitted on this account, since intention does not have to be taken into consideration by the court for the customs offence to be made out (Art. 373 of the CC).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9670

Admin. suprême

26 mai 1993

26 mai 1993

  AS TO WHETHER THE CASE SHOULD BE STRUCK OUT OF THE LIST The Government, being the party which had brought the case before the Court, notified the Registrar of its intention not to proceed with the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-67519

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2004

12 octobre 2004

Ministers once it had become final under Articles 44 and 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the judgment became final on 22 July 2003, the date upon which the parties informed the Court of their intention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-672

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2010

2 décembre 2010

In the Cantonal Court’s view, the fact that the applicant had clearly and repeatedly signalled his intention not to return to his country of origin, and that his wife had refused to sign a document acknowledging

Source officielle