CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202887
14 mai 2020
On what basis subsequent case law could silently overtake this clear original intention is not obvious.”
Page 6 sur 10266
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001608290
22 septembre 2009
No force was used against demonstrators who did not intrude into the “TRNC” border area and, in the case of demonstrators who were arrested for violating the border, no more force was used
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0602JUD006156108
2 juin 2016
She uses not only words but intonation, communicating non-verbally as well ... Of course, she is such a professional ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0416JUD004121408
16 avril 2019
The court concluded that the defendants’ intention was not to inform the public but rather to spread negative information about the plaintiff.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0126JUD002238619
26 janvier 2023
The judgment insisted that the legislature had had the clear intention of not automatically recognising the eligibility for a survivor’s pension of all members of a stable couple, but only the eligibility
ECLI:CEDH:001-168336
10 octobre 2016
The applicants could not be faulted for accepting that assertion and it could not be said that nothing new subsequently emerged to warrant a decision to no longer accept the Government’s claim.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0214DEC005343499
14 février 2006
Such transactions could be executed with the intention of not paying any tax. From 16-18 November 1992, there was a tax inspection concerning the transfer of shares from the applicant’s company.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710JUD004644309
10 juillet 2012
The conditions for liability under section 26 of the Damage Compensation Act no. 50/1993 had not been fulfilled.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0625JUD006831713
25 juin 2020
It further notes that it is not inadmissible on any other grounds. It must therefore be declared admissible. B. Merits 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1011DEC005084199
11 octobre 2001
It is not for them to decide.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1012DEC002899903
12 octobre 2010
The journalists' intention had not been to defame the applicant but to bring those facts to public attention. It concluded that the journalists had not acted in bad faith. 37.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0625JUD008102412
It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible. Merits 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0203JUD000410024
3 février 2026
In such circumstances the court accepted the respondent’s argument that he had acted under the belief that the dialogue with the journalist had been private and that his intention had not been to make
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0725JUD004889899
25 juillet 2001
The first idea was that if the Communists did not manage to gain power through the ballot box, they could do so by forcing the lock in the courts. There was no shortage of material.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0521REP001330887
21 mai 1992
In the light of the parties' reactions, the Commission now finds that there is no basis on which a friendly settlement can be effected. C.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1120JUD001784991
20 novembre 1995
sole responsibility for steering the ship and its manoeuvres", the Conseil d'Etat suggested that the word "responsibility" be replaced by the term "in command" since it seemed that "the Government's intention
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0925JUD001319187
25 septembre 1992
He cannot be acquitted on this account, since intention does not have to be taken into consideration by the court for the customs offence to be made out (Art. 373 of the CC).
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9670
26 mai 1993
AS TO WHETHER THE CASE SHOULD BE STRUCK OUT OF THE LIST The Government, being the party which had brought the case before the Court, notified the Registrar of its intention not to proceed with the
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-67519
12 octobre 2004
Ministers once it had become final under Articles 44 and 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the judgment became final on 22 July 2003, the date upon which the parties informed the Court of their intention
ECLI:CEDH:002-672
2 décembre 2010
In the Cantonal Court’s view, the fact that the applicant had clearly and repeatedly signalled his intention not to return to his country of origin, and that his wife had refused to sign a document acknowledging