CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1109JUD004630099
9 novembre 2004
There has accordingly been a breach of Article 6 § 1 in respect of this complaint also. II. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 65.
Page 60 sur 361
1ère Chambre
5fdc96d240a37eb9cad080e3
13 novembre 2018
Par conclusions du 25 mai 2018, la SPRÉ demande à la cour de : vu l'article 809, alinéa 2, du code de procédure civile, vu les articles L. 214-1 et suivants du code de la propriété intellectuelle,
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118JUD001395816
18 janvier 2024
There has accordingly been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 in Conjunction with ARTICLE 13 OF THE CONVENTION 58.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1124JUD004292708
24 novembre 2015
29979/04, § 71, 20 October 2011; and Pyrantienė , cited above, § 55). 38.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204JUD000185808
4 décembre 2018
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 13 IN CONNECTION WITH ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION 36.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1003JUD002947795
3 octobre 2000
Compliance with Article 6 § 1 1. Austria's reservation in respect of Article 6 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0620JUD001807802
20 juin 2006
He relied on Article 19 § 3 of the Constitution and Article 5 of the Convention. He contended that the court’s continued refusal to grant bail was groundless.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0428JUD007812911
28 avril 2015
In the present case the Constitutional Court expressly acknowledged the breach of the applicant’s rights under Article 5 § 4 and awarded him reimbursement of his legal costs, but rejected
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0831JUD007058317
31 août 2023
Costs and expenses 55. The applicant also claimed EUR 12,641.72 in respect of costs and expenses incurred before the Court. 56. The Government opposed that claim. 57.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0713JUD003218602
13 juillet 2006
Costs and expenses 36.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0713JUD003333102
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0526JUD000132804
26 mai 2011
There has accordingly been a breach of Article 6 § 1. II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF PROTOCOL NO. 4 45.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0624JUD002586019
24 juin 2021
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 3 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION 7.
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2022:SO00669
1 juin 2022
[OV] [VC], domicilié [Adresse 50], 110°/ à Mme [JB] [SA], divorcée [MI], domiciliée [Adresse 55], 111°/ à M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0707JUD001862303
7 juillet 2009
Article 5 § 3 of the Convention 21.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1030JUD002578303
30 octobre 2012
the scope of this Article (see Assenov and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0722JUD001898402
22 juillet 2010
They relied on Article 14 of the Convention in conjunction with Article 8. 22.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1202DEC001474089
2 décembre 1992
They invoke in this respect Article 6 para. 1 and Article 13 of the Convention. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0127JUD003958204
27 janvier 2011
APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 53.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1102JUD003049496
2 novembre 2004
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION 35.