Lord Justice Clarke considered that the District Judge and the Recorder had failed to apply the relevant legal principles correctly, and that permission to appeal should be granted, because otherwise no

The court noted that the applicants still had the right to restoration of G.O.’s land because their agreement had been lawful, and that they were on the list of candidates to be given new plots of land

It was, however, postponed until the following day because of the presiding judge’s mission to another town.

The court stated that, according to the police officers, the applicant had been totally aware of the situation, because he had been changing his version of the events, and that his statements had been

THE LAW The applicants complain under Articles 8 and 14 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that, because they were men, they were not entitled to the equivalent of widow’s benefits.

The expert examination was never performed because V. refused to show N. to the experts.

He wrote to the Benefits Agency again on 8 May 2000 and was rejected on 15 May 2000 on the ground that he was not entitled to widows’ benefits because he was not a woman.

The applicant's lawyer did not object because he stated that he had other court commitments. 27.

(gendre de Bernard C...) imitait la signature de son beau-père n'auraient pas été signés par Bernard C... lui-même si ce dernier avait réellement assuré ses fonctions d'administrateur et qu'il fallait

circonstance qu'ils ont été commis sur une mineure de quinze ans par une personne ayant autorité ; "aux motifs que tout avait commencé un soir alors que Y... était allée rejoindre sa mère et son beau-père

de la société SDM détenues par ses propres beaux-parents, observation étant faite que la volonté de vendre à leur gendre leurs parts sociales, par Alain X... et de son épouse, père et mère de la partie

Y..., Christel B..., qui n'était jusqu'alors jamais intervenue dans la procédure opposant sa mère à son beau-père, sortait de son silence "devant tant de mauvaise foi" de la part de son beau-père et de

avec sursis, et a statué sur les intérêts civils ; "aux motifs qu'Angélique Y... indiquait que le 18 janvier 2001 au matin, alors qu'elle dormait dans sa chambre au domicile de sa mère et de son beau-père

The court rejected the applicant’s request for legal aid at this stage of the proceedings, because “the domestic law did not provide for the right to free legal representation before appeal courts”.

France judgment that, where an appeal on points of law was declared inadmissible solely because the appellant had not surrendered to custody pursuant to the judicial decision challenged in the appeal,

However, because the applicant did not have a lawyer, the court would not proceed with the case and she was taken back to the police station, where she handed over her passport.

On 15 June 2004 the court refused to accept the action, because the applicants had not complained to a non ‑ judicial institution first, as was obligatory.

He also pointed to testimonies by witnesses in the case which had confirmed that the applicant had been verbally and physically assaulted and threatened by some of his colleagues because of the messages